To: jennychase
Why would tonight’s debate moderator pose the question of accepting election results if the election results are not subject to question?
2,314 posted on
10/19/2016 7:43:09 PM PDT by
Fester Chugabrew
(For Hillary: a podium to raise the odium.)
To: Fester Chugabrew
I was surprised Donald didn’t say, hey, I saw all those hands raised Last year at a debate that they would support the R nominee, and most of them broke their promise. I’m not playing THIS stupid game again, Chris!
To: Fester Chugabrew
Why would tonight’s debate moderator pose the question of accepting election results if the election results are not subject to question?Bingo.
2,422 posted on
10/19/2016 7:51:57 PM PDT by
bgill
(From the CDC site, "We don't know how people are infected with Ebola")
To: Fester Chugabrew
if the election results are not subject to question? Why wouldn't they be? They certainly have been in the past...including the last election. Romney thought he won, Obomber thought he lost.
2,767 posted on
10/19/2016 8:36:30 PM PDT by
ROCKLOBSTER
(RATs, RINOs......same thing.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson