Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: grey_whiskers; Jim Robinson; LS; holdonnow; neverdem; SunkenCiv; Cindy; LucyT; decimon; ...

In case anyone doesn’t want to wade through it.

This has Hillary Campaign staffers (note the .hillaryclinton.com addresses)

DISCUSSING THE PROGRESS OF THE INVESTIGATION

by the Dept. of State Inspector General, and the argument with the ODNI
(responsible for classifying) ...HOW MANY of the emails were Top Secret.
No Yoga or Chelsea’s wedding.

It is openly admitted that definitely one of the emails is Top Secret.
So their conclusion is, this isn’t a good story to defend Hillary: let’s have the New York Times bury the story of the leakage of Top Secret emails,
on their back page.

The State Dept — leaking information of a Criminal / Espionage investiation — TO the campaign —

the campaign casually discussing how they should have the New York Times spin this.

Can someone freaking get this to the Trump campaign or to Lou Dobbs or to Hannity or Limbaugh?

Nobody else is honest.

Don’t you think this is a bit worse than Octopussygate?

PS #HillaryGropedMe


11 posted on 10/16/2016 6:52:28 AM PDT by grey_whiskers (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: grey_whiskers

18 U.S. Code § 798 - Disclosure of classified information

(a) Whoever knowingly and willfully communicates, furnishes, transmits, or otherwise makes available to an unauthorized person, or publishes, or uses in any manner prejudicial to the safety or interest of the United States or for the benefit of any foreign government to the detriment of the United States any classified information—

(3) concerning the communication intelligence activities of the United States or any foreign government;

Shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both.

https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/798


13 posted on 10/16/2016 7:14:03 AM PDT by antidisestablishment ( We few, we happy few, we basket of deplorables)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

To: grey_whiskers

Also tweated to a few at Fox...


15 posted on 10/16/2016 7:37:11 AM PDT by bronxville (Americanism not Globalism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

To: grey_whiskers

This string evidently only involves the TS material from ODNI that was mishandled. The other TS emails (8 strings total) must be from material of other origins, like State, DOD, or the White House.


16 posted on 10/16/2016 7:45:08 AM PDT by USNBandit (Sarcasm engaged at all times)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

To: grey_whiskers

Getting ANYTHING that is ammunition for the Trump campaign isn’t the issue, is it?

The most definitive image of the campaign so far IMHO is Trump saying that his campaign advisors tell him to keep to the issues-—and with that he cuts off his teleprompters in order to go back to the bimbo issue.

If Hillary gets elected, America is going to go down the tubes because of one man’s ego. Trump doesn’t care. It’s all about him.


20 posted on 10/16/2016 8:58:34 AM PDT by wildbill (If you check behind the shower curtain for a slasher, and find one.... what's your plan?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

To: grey_whiskers; null and void; aragorn; EnigmaticAnomaly; kalee; TWhiteBear; WildHighlander57; ...

.

Wikileaks: HRC staff told by Dept of State of Top Secret emails, talk how to bury it in New York Times

Check out # 5 , 11 , 13 , 17 , 19 , 23 .

# 11:

In case anyone doesn’t want to wade through it.

This has Hillary Campaign staffers (note the .hillaryclinton.com addresses)

DISCUSSING THE PROGRESS OF THE INVESTIGATION

by the Dept. of State Inspector General, and the argument with the ODNI (responsible for classifying) ...HOW MANY of the emails were Top Secret.

No Yoga or Chelsea’s wedding.

It is openly admitted that definitely one of the emails is Top Secret.

So their conclusion is,

this isn’t a good story to defend Hillary: let’s have the New York Times bury the story of the leakage of Top Secret emails,

on their back page.

The State Dept — leaking information of a Criminal / Espionage investiation — TO the campaign —

the campaign casually discussing how they should have the New York Times spin this.

Can someone freaking get this to the Trump campaign or to Lou Dobbs or to Hannity or Limbaugh?

Nobody else is honest.

Don’t you think this is a bit worse than Octopussygate?

PS #HillaryGropedMe

Thanks, grey_whiskers.

24 posted on 10/16/2016 1:00:05 PM PDT by LucyT (If you aren't paranoid, you don't know what's going on.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson