1 posted on
10/15/2016 5:43:35 PM PDT by
MNDude
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-25 next last
To: MNDude
Threatening his family was vital.
He should have manned up and exposed it all.
2 posted on
10/15/2016 5:44:38 PM PDT by
Secret Agent Man
(Gone Galt; Not averse to Going Bronson.)
To: MNDude
Need something specific - death theats? Gays in the closet? Just being President Stompy Foot is not going to cut it.
3 posted on
10/15/2016 5:44:53 PM PDT by
Fido969
To: MNDude
... the President threw the gauntlet down last time on the Court, warning them in the first case that it would politicize the role of the Court for them to rule against the ACA. This was a threat? Oh, please.
4 posted on
10/15/2016 5:46:52 PM PDT by
Alberta's Child
("Go ahead, bite the Big Apple ... don't mind the maggots.")
To: MNDude
But I thought John Roberts left a diabolically clever trap in his decision that would undermine the whole thing? </Krauthammer et al
5 posted on
10/15/2016 5:52:33 PM PDT by
Ken H
(Best election ever!)
To: MNDude
And if this upcoming stolen election reaches this supreme court Roberts will be ‘persuaded’ to side with the democrats. That's why Scalia was taken out of the way. We think it's 4-4 but with a compromised Roberts it's actually 5-3 for their side now.
6 posted on
10/15/2016 5:52:45 PM PDT by
Bullish
(The fly on Hillary's foreheadknows)
To: MNDude
The entire D.C. needs to be nuked from orbit.
To: MNDude
Check to see if there’s mention of Scalia’s Body post assassination.
My bet is that it was death threats to family plus assassination and replacement with a judge who would.
9 posted on
10/15/2016 5:55:14 PM PDT by
Bayard
To: MNDude
I don’t see any coercion.
To: MNDude
Court, warning them in the first case that it would politicize the role of the Court for them to rule against the ACA. As a close reader of the case, I honestly believe that was vital to scaring Roberts off" Can anyone explain why/how that would "scare Roberts off?"
Alternately politicizing the court is already part of the problem.
Nothing makes sense.
Who writes this stuff?
24 posted on
10/15/2016 6:13:14 PM PDT by
publius911
(IMPEACH HIM NOW evil, stupid, insane ignorant or just clueless, doesn't matter!)
To: MNDude
Obama admin blackmailed Roberts over the private - and possibly irregular - adoption of two Irish children who were in Latin America (country/territory not known). Boy & girl 4.5 months apart in age, but not related.
To: MNDude
29 posted on
10/15/2016 6:24:20 PM PDT by
Nifster
(Ignore all polls. Get Out The Vote)
To: MNDude
Trump needs to be extra careful to appoint judges who are strong enough in terms of spine to resist blackmail but also appoint people who are not black mailable.
30 posted on
10/15/2016 6:26:09 PM PDT by
Cen-Tejas
(it's the debt bomb stupid)
To: MNDude
Comey - Corrupted FBI
Roberts - Corrupted SCOTUS
Lerner - Corrupted IRS
33 posted on
10/15/2016 6:30:57 PM PDT by
gaijin
To: MNDude
I ‘happened’ to surf FOX and Judge Janeine was reporting on this.
38 posted on
10/15/2016 6:47:44 PM PDT by
right way right
(May we remain sober over mere men, for God really is our one and only true hope.)
To: MNDude
The Republican leadership in both houses aided the passage of the ACA, and they aided it in very big ways. So both parties are guilty of this POC
42 posted on
10/15/2016 6:50:27 PM PDT by
stockpirate
(OBAMA MUST BE ON THE PAYROLL OF THE CLINTON FOUNDATION.)
To: MNDude
The Republican leadership in both houses aided the passage of the ACA, and they aided it in very big ways. So both parties are guilty of this POC
43 posted on
10/15/2016 6:50:27 PM PDT by
stockpirate
(OBAMA MUST BE ON THE PAYROLL OF THE CLINTON FOUNDATION.)
To: MNDude
If so, the current ruling is null and void. A president Trump would then, in this case be justified in suspending Obamacare by EO until a new decision could be rendered with new justices.
An investigation into charges of coercion could lead to a nullification of the decision and prosecution of Obama.
46 posted on
10/15/2016 6:56:34 PM PDT by
grumpygresh
(We don't have Democrats and Republicans, we have the Faustian uni-party)
To: MNDude
It may not happen in this flesh world, but Roberts will pay for his whacking US with the Marxist legislation. He should have done the ‘right’ thing but that is NOT who he is.
47 posted on
10/15/2016 6:58:29 PM PDT by
Just mythoughts
(Jesus said Luke 17:32 Remember Lot's wife.)
To: MNDude
49 posted on
10/15/2016 7:01:24 PM PDT by
dragnet2
(Diversion and evasion are tools of deceit)
To: MNDude
53 posted on
10/15/2016 7:05:59 PM PDT by
stocksthatgoup
(When the MSM wants your opinion, they will give it to you)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-25 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson