Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Moonman62

Thank you for your insightful post. Appreciate it.

The Eglin test was as expected, but my read of the report shows something different than your read.

According to my read of the report, most observers can see the launch plume but all lost sight post motor burn-out: “All observers reported that they were unable to see the body of the missile from any range.” (Page 254 of the report, http://www.ntsb.gov/investigations/AccidentReports/Reports/AAR0003.pdf)

Moreover, seeing the missile detonate was unobserved by witnesses. Footnote 530 says - “Not all observers reported observing the missile selfdestruct. For example, during the first launch, five of the six observers positioned within 6 nm of the launch site reported observing the missile selfdestruct. NONE of the observers positioned more than 6 nm from the launch site reported observing the missile selfdestruct.” (Same report, page 255)

Cheers.


59 posted on 10/16/2016 10:07:11 AM PDT by Hulka
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies ]


To: Hulka

I guess I remember the part about them seeing the plume. The rest is very telling isn’t it?

The NTSB report shows that the they took the possibility of a missile very seriously.


61 posted on 10/16/2016 11:39:31 AM PDT by Moonman62 (Make America Great Again!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson