Isn't the verified story of how Clinton celebrated how she got the rapist off with time-served by debasing the 12-year-old victim and by having the damning evidence (the child's blood-soaked panties that were contaminated with the rapist's semen) thrown out on a technicality of "national importance"?
Do you think the NYT is going to be consistent with their editorial philosophy and publish that story so as not to commit "a disservice not just to our readers but to democracy itself to silence [Kathy Shelton's] voice"?