Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Juanita Broadderick Meets the Press (WSJ -"too credible a witness"
The Wall Street Journal ^ | February 19, 1999 | Dorothy Rabinowitz

Posted on 10/13/2016 4:54:04 AM PDT by Beautiful_Gracious_Skies

VAN BUREN, Ark.--To any reporter, it was the kind of story that doesn't come along often in a career--an alleged 1978 sexual assault involving William Jefferson Clinton, then attorney general of Arkansas. From the viewpoint of Juanita Broaddrick, it has been a trial and concern ever since reports began emerging in the 1992 presidential campaign, through the Paula Jones...

(Excerpt) Read more at wsj.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: clinton; rabinowitz; rape; repositoryclinton; wsj
Posting to preserve the WSJ record while the full article is still available.

Bill Clinton IS a rapist.

1 posted on 10/13/2016 4:54:05 AM PDT by Beautiful_Gracious_Skies
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Beautiful_Gracious_Skies

The full article and the commentary is no unavailable except to subscribers , but it can be found here:

http://anusha.com/wsjbroad.htm

“To encounter this woman, to hear the details of her story and the statements of the corroborating witnesses, was to understand that this was an event that in fact took place.” Dorothy Rabinowitz

It must have been painful for Dorothy to report the truth!


2 posted on 10/13/2016 5:09:08 AM PDT by Beautiful_Gracious_Skies
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Beautiful_Gracious_Skies
Bill Clinton IS a rapist

Yup,although I wasn't there I'd be willing to bet that Juanita Broderick is telling the truth...as are several others.I'm strongly inclined to believe them for several reasons.His undeniable association with Jeffery Epstein is one and the fact that we *know* Monica Lewinsky was telling the truth is another.

3 posted on 10/13/2016 5:18:11 AM PDT by Gay State Conservative (Deplorables' Lives Matter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gay State Conservative

Broaddrick also told Rabinowitz that after her interview with NBC’s Myers, NBC had balked at airing it. The Clinton impeachment proceedings were in full swing, and there was an apparent sentiment within the network not to add to Clinton’s woes. According to Broaddrick., Myers had said to her:

“The good news is you’re credible. The bad news is you’re very credible.”

NBC finally aired the Myers-Broaddrick interview, but it was long after Clinton was acquitted by the Senate in the impeachment trial. They wanted to protect Bill Clinton and held the story back as long as possible.

At one point early on Broaddrick had even denied the story in an affidavit out of fear. But when the lawyers for Clinton’s special prosecutor Kenneth Starr came to her, realizing lying to a federal prosecutor in a presidential impeachment trial was at a whole other level, Broaddrick came forth with her story.

Actually, the first impeachment jury — members of the U.S. House — read Broaddrick’s testimony. Juanita was known as “Jane Doe No. 5” and her testimony was kept in a closed “evidence room” accessible (but not removable) to Congressmen. Here’s what Connecticut moderate Republican, Christopher Shays, had to say about Juanita’s testimony to local news radio host, Tom Scott:

“I believed that he had done it. I believed her that she had been raped 20 yrs ago. And it was vicious rapes, it was twice at the same event.” Later in the session, Tom Scott bluntly asks of Shays: “Do you personally believe our president is a rapist?”

Shays responded: “I would like not to say it that way. But the bottom line is that I believe that he did rape Broaddrick.”


4 posted on 10/13/2016 5:30:03 AM PDT by Beautiful_Gracious_Skies
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Beautiful_Gracious_Skies
Broaddrick also told Rabinowitz that after her interview with NBC’s Myers, NBC had balked at airing it.

And this is why the Democrats control the government. Even when Republicans have a majority, the Democrats control the government by what they tell the American people.

They do more harm to the interests of the nation by refusing to broadcast information which is damaging to Democrats.

Our party should have been focusing on destroying this Democrat monopoly of the airwaves instead of trying to get along with it.

5 posted on 10/13/2016 6:07:06 AM PDT by DiogenesLamp ("of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Beautiful_Gracious_Skies

Bkmk


6 posted on 10/13/2016 6:08:46 AM PDT by sauropod (Beware the fury of a patient man. I've lost my patience!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DiogenesLamp

And what did George Bush do when he had control?

Absolutely Nothing. He had the opportunity in 2001 to change government and the course of the media.

He was too lazy to fire the Clinton cabal and left them in place throughout government. He did not ever challenge the media.


7 posted on 10/13/2016 6:25:19 AM PDT by Beautiful_Gracious_Skies
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Beautiful_Gracious_Skies
NBC finally aired the Myers-Broaddrick interview, but it was long after Clinton was acquitted by the Senate in the impeachment trial.

With no promotion and at the same time as the Grammy Awards.

8 posted on 10/13/2016 7:31:04 AM PDT by Jeff Chandler (Everywhere is freaks and hairies Dykes and fairies, tell me where is sanity?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Beautiful_Gracious_Skies
And what did George Bush do when he had control?

Absolutely Nothing. He had the opportunity in 2001 to change government and the course of the media.

He was too lazy to fire the Clinton cabal and left them in place throughout government. He did not ever challenge the media.

I have come to the conclusion that the Bush family and the left wing leadership are more or less buddies and share some common interests and goals.

9 posted on 10/13/2016 8:57:33 AM PDT by DiogenesLamp ("of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Gay State Conservative

Here’s another reason I believe Juanita. Clinton’s lawyer, David Kendall, issued the following denial - The president did not assault Mrs. Broaddrick.

There are three things wrong with this denial. Clinton wasn’t president at the time. Rape is not assault. She wasn’t Mrs. Broaddrick at the time.

Side note - in checking the spelling of Broaddrick, I came across an article saying that Michael Isikoff said that NBC should run Lisa Meyers’ interview with Juanita in its entirety. He noted that she claimed Hillary was involved, and that this was edited out.

http://freebeacon.com/politics/michael-isikoff-nbc-release/


10 posted on 10/13/2016 3:05:03 PM PDT by Tymesup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Beautiful_Gracious_Skies
He was too lazy to fire the Clinton cabal and left them in place throughout government. He did not ever challenge the media.

Bush was not lazy. Bush was not stupid. Bush was part of it, as an insider of the UniParty.

11 posted on 10/13/2016 3:16:29 PM PDT by PapaBear3625 (Big government is attractive to those who think that THEY will be in control of it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson