Clinton accused Shelton of ‘seeking out older men’ in the case and demanded that she undergo a grueling court-ordered psychiatric examination .....( order shown back thread).
On the audiotape, Clinton indicated that she believed Taylor, her client, was guilty, saying that his ability to pass a lie detector test ‘forever destroyed my faith in polygraphs’.
Can “grueling” be documented?
This sounds like any aggressive attorney using what the courts allowed. The problem came afterward when she mocked, which was unnecessary and gratuitous. Today now we have crimes for which certain avenues of investigation of truth are too politically correct to examine.
I would like to hear Hillary explain how this girl’s imagination created “fondling” that put herself into a coma.
The whole thing stinks. And the M.O of “Oops. The evidence just somehow disappeared....”
But now Wikileaks has exposed the emails showing that she deliberately, knowing it was illegal, destroyed evidence subpoenaed by the US Congress.
I don’t want her to rot in Hell. I want her to repent, which means to come to a full understanding of just how heinous a thing she did against just how precious a person in God’s sight. It means she sees and accepts the worm that she is.
I want her to repent during her prison time.