Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Pinkbell
They have nothing here as the article admits it raises the possibility he has paid no federal taxes for nearly two decades.The article also admits all they have is the first page of his state income tax that first, is illegal to publish, and second, the info they have has nothing to do with federal taxes. So, they are guessing at something they have no information to prove. Unless they are doing it on purpose to fool the public and chase votes away from Trump on purpose. And they will have to admit they were wrong on page 110 of one of their next issues to keep from getting a suit laid on them.

But the damage has been done because the public is reacting like Trump has done something criminal they are wording in a way where it appears to be something else they supposedly said. Mission accomplished. They dirtied him by allowing the public to misinterpret the article incorrectly through suggestion. red

37 posted on 10/02/2016 7:25:03 AM PDT by Redwood71 (uad.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Redwood71

I don’t know why you think the public will react negatively to this. Some may, the uneducated, the hard left, perhaps. But I think far more will think “yes!” At least that’s what I’m sensing among various friends and acquaintances, many of whom are independent or undecided voters.


47 posted on 10/02/2016 7:53:23 AM PDT by Chengdu54
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson