Posted on 09/30/2016 1:06:57 PM PDT by nuconvert
Anders Fogh Rasmussen was prime minister of Denmark from 2001 to 2009, and months later began serving as NATO secretary general until 2014. He is currently promoting his new book, The Will to Lead: America’s Indispensable Role in the Global Fight for Freedom. The Washington Free Beacon interviewed Mr. Rasmussen during a visit this week to Washington D.C.
-excerpt-
WFB: The central theme of your book is the exceptional importance of U.S. leadership. But what would you say to the American who says, “Let the world deal with its own problems. Keep us out of it?”
Rasmussen: I would tell the Smith family in Peoria: the overall headline would be that it’s in your self-interest to be the global leader. I would suggest three things. First, if you do not attack the enemy on their soil, they will attack you on your soil. You saw that on Sept. 11, 2001. Go overseas and fight the enemy. Secondly, I would say that prevention is less expensive than a cure. So it’s very important for the U.S. to address conflicts while they are still small and manageable. The U.S. should not do what it did in the 1920s and 1930s and let world problems grow to a point that resolving those problems costs a huge amount of blood and treasure. Third, it is in the U.S. interest to preserve the world order that the U.S. itself created after the Second World War.
It’s a fact that America prospers when the world is at peace and free trade flows across borders. And that’s what came out of President Truman’s framework after the Second World War. He created institutions that have served an unprecedented era of peace. And right now that order is under attack from Putin, from terrorists, from rogue states everywhere.
(Excerpt) Read more at freebeacon.com ...
If not us, there will be someone else.
China
Russia
Involved? Absolutely
World’s cops? Get lost
Odd, they scream and yell about us getting their business, vilify us, and hate us...when faced with the prospect of not having us pick up the tab, they have a tantrum.
Former NATO Chief: The United States Should Be the World’s [free] ‘Policeman’
Corrections welcome.
Had an English roommate in graduate school back in the mid 80’s.
I asked him why they criticized the US but not Russia?
He said, we live next to Russia. If the US isn’t going to lead, we sure as heck aren’t going to.
We can take duty or shirk duty but we are the world’s policeman whether we like it or not. Doesn’t mean we have to stick our nose into everything, but if something endangers our security we should act, no matter where the problem originates. Isolationism is not an option when weapons can strike anywhere.
-PJ
We might have different definitions of ‘world’s policemen’ because I have no interest in isolationism.
Why? So Denmark can spend money on free goodies for their smug population of wimps?
No more American blood for European comfort!
Couple trillion a year? Who should the bill be sent to?
That role is most successfully filled when the "policeman" is advancing his country's interest, and here I cite every successful empire from Rome to the British. When he is suckered into behaving otherwise, the empire falls. We're being suckered by globalists and NWO fantasists, and they aren't worth the blood they're costing. This is not an argument for isolation, it's an argument for clearly identifying what is in America's interest and pursuing that, not some silly fictive Greater Good.
Doesn’t this NATO Chief understand that Policemen get paid for their service?
Exceptional effective policeman are clean, honest and lead by example.
Ignoring founding father’s advice cautioning America to “avoid foreign entanglements”, has been disasterous for countries we interfered in, and our own country in so many ways.
Our “world police” war actions since 2003 have damaged six country’s social, political and economic order, killed TENS of THOUSANDS of innocents, displaced MILLIONS,and resulted in creating angry Islamic refugee hordes now distablizing NATO allies.
This must stop.
Police Commissioner Obama is on the Take
Yeah but who does the world call when it needs a cop?
The World’s Policeman?
Only if the rest of the world pays the bill for their security. Why do we donate our treasure and our warrior’s lives to an ungrateful world???
Let them start paying the interest on our debt and receive no more charity from us in the form of “foreign aid.”.
That would be a start.
I guess he hasn’t heard about the current persecution of police officers in America.
“We can take duty or shirk duty but we are the world’s policeman whether we like it or not. Doesn’t mean we have to stick our nose into everything, but if something endangers our security we should act, no matter where the problem originates. Isolationism is not an option when weapons can strike anywhere.”
True, but these worthless freeloading European Countries ( and the Asian Countries too) need to start paying us the full cost of protecting them. And that includes ponying up their soldiers when there’s a fight somewhere, because I’d be for letting them get their asses kicked by Russia (or China) if they think our protection comes for free any longer.
How disparate are the USA’s NATO dues compared to these euro-pikers? They are too busy funding their socialist idiocy to want to pay their fair share.
How disparate are the USA’s NATO dues compared to these euro-pikers? They are too busy funding their socialist idiocy to want to pay their fair share.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.