Jim’s eyes are fine, but he is a bought and paid for Clinton crony having exonerated them twice before on other matters.
Was the Fix in on FBI Investigation of Hillary Clintons Emails?
Posted By Roger Aronoff On September 30, 2016
The more that details about the FBIs investigation into Hillary Clintons email practices come to light, the more their efforts appear to have been a sham designed to exonerate her of wrongdoing from the very beginning. As we wrote, the Department of Justices (DOJ) failure to indict Hillary, based on the recommendation of FBI Director James Comey, has moved the United States closer to banana republic status [1].
The Clinton familys ongoing corruption and Hillary Clintons pay-to-play as secretary of state have also created a precedent which could encourage other politicians to enrich themselves at the expense of the integrity of their office. The FBIs light touch also has created a double standard on national security, where high-profile figures such as Mrs. Clinton walk free while others lose their security clearance or are fined or jailed.
Yet some on the left are unhappy with Comeys investigation because of the comments he made publicly characterizing Mrs. Clinton as extremely careless with classified information. What Comey should have done was handle the Clinton probe like any other routine inquiry: provide confidential recommendations to prosecutors, release a strictly factual statement noting that the investigation would be closed, and resist external pressures to inappropriately air the FBIs findings outside a court of law, argues [2] Riley Roberts, former speechwriter for former Attorney General Eric Holder, in Politico Magazine.
http://www.aim.org/aim-column/was-the-fix-in-on-fbi-investigation-of-hillary-clintons-emails/print/