Posted on 09/30/2016 8:09:28 AM PDT by Beautiful_Gracious_Skies
Donald Trumps campaign is signaling that Bill Clintons history of affairs and alleged sexual misconduct as well as Hillary Clintons treatment of the women involved is now fair game, after his Democratic opponent took the first shot by calling out his own negative comments toward women at Mondays debate.
The Republican nominee took a direct swipe at the former president during a New Hampshire rally on Thursday, in a sign of jabs to come.
"The American people have had it with years and decades of Clinton corruption and scandal," Trump said. "And impeachment for lying.
Remember that?"
(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...
Juanita Broaddrick, one of Bill Clintons Arkansas rape victims, responded to the former first daughter via a tweet: 4 YOUR FATHER WAS, AND PROBABLY STILL IS, A SEXUAL PREDATOR. YOUR MOTHER HAS ALWAYS LIED AND COVERED UP FOR HIM. JUANITA BROADDRICK (@ATENSNUT) SEPTEMBER 28, 2016
Chelsea: Its a distraction from his inability to talk about whats actually at stake in this election and to offer concrete, comprehensive proposals about the economy, or our public school system, or debt-free college, or keeping our country safe and Americans safe here at home and around the world.
Donald Trump has boldly done what no other presidential candidate has ever done. He told reporters immediately after the debate that he held back bringing up Bill Clintons extra-marital affairs and sexual assault accusations out of respect for their daughter, Chelsea, being in the room.
Donald's compassion and sensitivity was rewarded with angst from Chelsea as she retorted: I dont remember a time in my life when my parents and my family werent being attacked."
While it certainly was embarrassing to grow up in the public eye with a philandering daddy, it is unclear at what time Chelsea was made aware of the multiple accusations of her father's assaults on women. Certainly, watching the fallout from Bill being impeached for lying about having sexual relations with a young intern a few years her senior had to have been devastating. We all felt sorry for Chelsea being subjected to his immoral disgusting public life and being raised by lying liberal parents.
But she's all grown up now and spews the PC response.
Chelsea accuses Donald Trump of attacking ..."whole swaths of our country and even our global community: women, Muslims, Americans with disabilities, a Gold Star family. I mean, that, to me, is far more troubling than whatever his most recent screed against my mom or my family."
Chelsea, We all know it was Hillary-mommy dearest- that attacked 'whole swaths' when she dubbed tens of millions of Americans a basket of deplorables.
Plus, Hillary had her minions warn, threaten and berate Bill's lady victims whoa unto them that dared to report what Bill Clinton had done to them behind closed doors.
Hillary attacked a Gold Star parent when she labeled Patty Smith a liar. She has ignored Mrs. Smith's pleas to uncover exactly what happened to her son in Libya.
Back in the 80's and 90's Hillary referred to Bill's victims as 'bimbo eruptions.' In today's environment, she'd likely say, "toss a burka over her head and send her on her way." That's how far she's come in the defense of her sisterhood of women.
Hillary has found President's Clinton's harm and degradation of young women acceptable and only a nuisance to the 'Clinton Career plan.'
The truth needs to be disseminated and repeated everywhere.
They brought shame to the White House and our nation, they will do worse this time if allowed the opportunity.
So goes hillary’s gender gap advantage....
I am down with this but he has to keep the focus on Hillary’s part in this. The fact that our great defender of women was out there covering up all of these trists and possible rapes. How about the fact that Juanita Brodderick after making rape allegations against Billy boy, Hillary pulls her aside at an event and puts the squeeze on her to keep her mouth shut. That stuff is all fair game. Especially since she is bringing up Trumps past.
The “Trump card” will be that little audio recording of Hillary after she got a child rapist, she knew was guilty, out of a jail sentence.
Yeah . Trump should focus on Hillary and the fact that she is a liar, criminal and most of all a communist
Something like this, I think, would be very effective.
Bill produced this Afterburner around 7 years ago in response to the joyful media coronation of obozo. (If my use of that name for him offends you, you’re probably a lib and should move on before you’re further offended. I reserve capitalization and correct spelling for PROPER names I respect and I certainly do not respect him. And I find him about as IMPROPER as I would any other TRAITOR.)
But I digress!
The liberal suck-ups comprising the vast proportion (or is that HALF VAST?) of the media here who aided putting obozo — the narcissistic idiot-savant whose only known skill is destroying America — in the White House again have the throttle fire-walled, this time for Clinton!
Bill skewers these “half-vast” urinalists in this 13 minute Star Trek parody.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rG5inw9LHr0
Unfortunately, the last charge while true does not hold the same ring to it as it did 25 years ago. For those of us who grew up and spent adulthood during the cold war it means something. However, my youngest daughter was born the year the Soviet Union collapsed. My kids have no idea about worldwide communism and the USSR. It doesn’t have the same impact for a lot of younger people. That’s why someone like Bernie can get traction nowadays.
But the snowflakes said he Tweeted.....Oh noooss.
Yes!! about time.
Bill produced this Afterburner around 7 years ago in response to the joyful media coronation of obozo. (If my use of that name for him offends you, you’re probably a lib and should move on before you’re further offended. I reserve capitalization and correct spelling for PROPER names I respect and I certainly do not respect him. And I find him about as IMPROPER as I would any other TRAITOR.)
But I digress!
The liberal suck-ups comprising the vast proportion (or is that HALF VAST?) of the media here who aided putting obozo — the narcissistic idiot-savant whose only known skill is destroying America — in the White House again have the throttle fire-walled, this time for Clinton!
Bill skewers these “half-vast” urinalists in this 13 minute Star Trek parody.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rG5inw9LHr0
Trump needs to begin calling Hillary the “ENABLER” instead of tying her to Bill’s escapades.
Exactly. Going after the cheating husband will only create more sympathy for Hillary.
If he’s going to go this route he himself needs to not be the one bringing it up, he needs a Gloria Allred of the right—with an airtight case.
and this on the heels of reports bubba is being kept off the campaign trail because he’s letting another chick play with his willy...
Re: Post 1 ~
“They brought shame to the White House and our nation, they will do worse this time if allowed the opportunity.”
Yes. I believe the Clintons had so disgraced the White House, and lowered the bar to new depths; that indirectly allowed the unwashed masses to elect and re-elect BHO in our current era.
Bill/Hill erased what was left of the integrity of the Office!
What about that half assed video Hillary made, in which she said victims of sexual assault have the right to be heard and be believed???
A pointed question for Hillary would be, do Juanita Broderick, Paula Jones, et. al. have the right to be heard and be believed???
And could we question why the Clintons settled the Paula Jones case for $850,000, if there is nothing to see there????
Personally I’d stay away from it and focus on the fundamental policy differences.
But if “we” are going that route, it needs IMO to be both persuasive and pushed by someone other than Trump directly.
I have heard that Ronald Reagan never removed his jacket in the oval office (let alone drop trou).
His perjury denied Paula Jones her day in court - denied her Justice.
Fortunately, she recovered later to the tune of $850,000.
Re: Post #16 ~
*And could we question why the Clintons settled the Paula Jones case for $850,000, if there is nothing to see there????*
Good question. Also, where did the 850k stolen from?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.