[Toespi]

They would risk this immediately after a debate, with millions watching, cameras everywhere, and Trumps team on stage? Just doesn’t make sense.

[Sacajaweau]

Sometimes people assume the camera is elsewhere....but the attempt to put Holt’s back to the camera during the handoff is undeniable.

[Right-wing Librarian]

>>They would risk this immediately after a debate, with millions watching, cameras everywhere, and Trumps team on stage? Just doesn’t make sense.
************************************************************
Why would they do this? Sheer arrogance, utter contempt.

Hey, when you’ve gotten away with jaw-dropping crimes, and even procured immunity for your 1st string lieutenants, etc., it’s not a stretch to realize they have a strong sense of bold entitlement....in the vein of “IN YOUR FACE”.

And why not? We are all witness to them being ABOVE THE LAW in this post-American Republic in which we now live.

[bk1000]

“They would risk this immediately after a debate, with millions watching, cameras everywhere, and Trumps team on stage? Just doesn’t make sense.”

They are that brazen. They know there will be no real push to get answers. If they don’t have whatever the guy took, all he has to do is take the 5th. Look at Sandy Berger. Everybody knew he was guilty. They knew what he was guilty of, but we still don’t know what he took. This is all going to make an interesting movie when/if the truth comes out.

[Hulka]

In plain sight. Usually works.

[nclaurel]

The Clintons believe they are immune to everything. She lies about comments that she knows are on video. She laughed and said “Not at All” when asked if she feared prosecution in FBI investigation. I believe BJ said “ next time bring Kreptonite” when he was not removed after impeachment.

Do you think they had any concerns about repercussions on this cheating in front of cameras? They thumb their noses at “common folk” all the time.