Posted on 09/29/2016 3:05:02 AM PDT by Biggirl
At least we know Trump wasnt lying when he said he didn't practice for the debate. Based on the behavior of trained, professional journalists, I gather I'm not supposed to say what I really thought of the debate, but to cheer like a pom-pom girl for my candidate. But the truth is, I -- along with my Trump-supporting friends -- thought it was a draw: Trump won the first half, and Hillary won the second half. Since most people stopped paying attention after the first 30 minutes, that's a win for Trump.
(Excerpt) Read more at frontpagemag.com ...
From now until the next debate, every single person who works for Trump should personally insult him several times a day.
Good morning, sir -- your business is a total fraud.
Here are those trade stats you wanted -- oh and you lied about opposing the war in Iraq.
The Cincinnati airport needs a tail number -- why did you "fat-shame" that poor girl?
If he starts to respond, they should say, "No one cares, sir. Tell me how you're going to stop Mexican drugs from pouring across our border."
LOL
At last, a summary of the debate that I will accept.
He should coun the insults - out loud. Racist! That’s one. Bigot! That’s two.
Yep, good summary and I would live to see his crew take her advice. I’d love to see the look on his face if Rudy G walked in and pulled one of those lines on him...
Here are those trade stats you wanted — oh and you lied about opposing the war in Iraq.
LOL...
Ann Coulter nails it again...
I must have too many Coulter books and blogs over the years. Because my takeaway was exactly the same, down to the attention span of 30 ( I said 20 to 40),
I even called into a local morning talk show to which the RINO libertarian (and who has continually pulled for dems since I can remember) host disagreed.
But, it was blatantly obvious that Trump needs to practice a countering answering tactic of “unlike my opponent who...” and then push the HRC’s rhetoric out before citing his own position. Just to be clear...
NBC, the Nobody But Clinton network, came out with their biased poll: Clinton, 52%: Trump, 21%; Neither, 26%. Is anyone surprised?
If Trimp won the debate, why are so many people telling him what to do differently next time? Coulter is right. He needs to focus on the issues and on Clinton’s weaknesses rather than himself. The moderators will never be fair to him, but he has to overcome that by using his time to make his cases, even if he goes beyond the scope of the biased questions.
Typo. “Trump” instead of “Trimp”.
The next “debate” is a Townhall type “moderated” once again by Liberal-Leftist “journalists.” Expect an audience packed with ringers armed with questions that Clinton was given in advance.
This will be extremely challenging for Trump. He has to pivot off the ringer’s questions with a brief answer and then launch a withering attack on Clinton. If the “moderators” step in he has to attack them too.
Keep the focus on Clinton’s record of corruption and failure. And if she attacks Trump as a misogynist Trump needs to “go there” and slam her with Bill’s treatment of women and her complicity in smearing Bill’s many “girlfriends.”
It’s war, Trump. Don’t leave any more arrows in your quiver.
With her health being what it is I think we should become better acquainted with Tim Kaine.
This is what CATO has to say:
He did not win. He tried not to lose and it did not work.
2-3-4 times a week I do just that. I go to the high school gym (scheduled adult rec) or an outdoor basketball court, shut off the phone and play ball for an hour and a half or two hours. Politics are a forbidden topic for off-court discussions, although sometimes we get into it while rehydrating at the pub later.
Super take from Coulter.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.