To: artichokegrower
That officer fired his handgun and a second officer, farther away, simultaneously fired his electric stun gun Two officers on the scene. One felt the situation could be handled with his Tazer and the other felt the situation required deadly force. Why the different conclusions?
To: DoodleDawg
Which one was being aimed at?
To: DoodleDawg
Two officers on the scene. One felt the situation could be handled with his Tazer and the other felt the situation required deadly force. Why the different conclusions? Did both officers have both types of weapons on them at the time? Maybe the one officer who shot the fire-arm was not armed with a stun-gun, or was not within range of a stun-gun, and thus did not have that option.
Regards,
64 posted on
09/28/2016 9:22:59 PM PDT by
alexander_busek
(Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.)
To: DoodleDawg
The one with the Tazer was further away. Distance makes any situation seem less dangerous.
70 posted on
09/29/2016 2:24:15 AM PDT by
wbarmy
(I chose to be a sheepdog once I saw what happens to the sheep.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson