Posted on 09/28/2016 5:26:05 AM PDT by kevcol
Donaldf Trump has warned he is willing to unleash “extremely rough” personal attacks on Hillary Clinton in the next Presidential debate.
The Republican hopeful said he came close to exploiting Bill Clinton’s previous sex scandals but chose not to because the Clinton’s daughter, Chelsea, was in attendance.
.
.
Following the debate, Hillary Clinton’s official Twitter account released a short video of the Venezuelan model detailing the reported abuse she allegedly suffered at the hands of Trump
(Excerpt) Read more at express.co.uk ...
I agree. It’s a threat to prevent The Beast from playing the female card.
What I would like to see him revisit is just how is it that the birther issue is "racist". And when Hillary explains that then ask her if her aides were being racist when they vetted Obama.
I agree. He wouldn’t broadcast his plan to his enemy.
Nice picture but I hope you don’t tweet it.
“Trump needs to educate millennial and others that Hillary helped Bill in destroying women’s lives!”
Yes! That is the tact he needs to take. He can mention Bill’s “relationships”, rapes, near rapes, etc., quickly and softly — even list the names. Then he needs to ATTACK by moving on to the actual travesty, i.e., Hillary’s treatment of the women through threats and intimidation. Maybe even murder (see the “Clinton Body Count”).
He needs to bring up Hillary’s employee, Betsy, whose sole job description was to manage Bill’s “bimbo eruptions” to cover up Bill’s crap. Every woman who tried to protect herself was thrown into the “nuts and sluts” basket by Hillary and their lives were destroyed!
Hillary’s saying she’s “for women”. She said, “To every survivor of sexual assault...You have the right to be heard. You have the right to be believed. We’re with you.” —Hillary”. But she has done the exact opposite.
THAT is what Trump needs to emphasize instead of Bill’s philandering.
Hilda beast has enough legitimate ineptitude for him to trounce on that he doesn’t need to take cheap sleazy shots. He does need to have his facts in order, and be able to show exactly how she has caused irreparable harm to our country, and show her to be totally not credible, as well as a continued danger to us as a people and a nation.
What ARE the direct negative effects to national security, the economy, to women & children? How has she contributed to the overall degradation of women, health or education?
One example I read last week concerned a bad batch of medicines that came from the Clinton foundation. So, he’s need to fact check that and show how it’s a current problem.
Show the numbers regarding salaries and administrative costs of that foundation and the fact that only a tiny fraction of the donated monies is actually used for charity.
This man knows how to do a business presentation so there’s no reason for him to not produce a marketable sales pitch that is clear, concise, accurate and delivers a one-two punch. He also needs to be prepared to show the sources of info so that others can fact check.
As soon as the low blow personal insults come out, it’s a dead giveaway that the person delivering the dirt has lost the argument.
I watched him on the apprentice so it’s proof that he knows exactly how to clearly and succinctly wrap a person into the web and suck the life out of them..like a spider. And he can do it quietly, with a smile.
He can do it, but he really needs to pull his head out of his a$$ and go there, Trump style.
And immigration too. Of course Holt didn’t bring it up, but Trump could have brought it more into the discussion of the economy and wages.
Also, when Trump recently made the very obvious, common sense statement that no foreigner has a right of immigration to the United States, Hillary’s official Twitter page responded with “We disagree”, which can only be taken as meaning Hillary things foreigners do have a right to immigrate, which is a radical, extreme view if ever there was one.
Combine that with Hillary’s radical support for increasing Syrian refugees by 500%, plus her support for massively increasing overall legal immigration, and her announcement that the only way her administration would deport an illegal alien is if they murder or rape someone, and Trump has lots of easy targets on immigration. On all of these points Hillary is pushing positions that most Americans oppose, but of course the media will not report that. And there is no chance at all that a question will make it through that is crafted to make Hillary explain her radical positions, and there is no chance that a moderator will put a follow-up question to Hillary along those lines. So Trump will have to make these points and put her on the defensive about them. They’d be more effective, I think, than talking about building the beautiful wall and making Mexico pay for it.
I just don’t think Trump can finesse an attack with regards to Bill Clinton’s predatory nature to show Hillary as an enabler. It’s a high risk strategy, with questionable reward.
You are correct. It is Hillary’s role in white washing his affairs by targeting the women s bimbos as immoral.
The Vast Right-Wing Conspiracy was her MO during that time. I suggest Trump brings up the VRWC comment and how Hillary always blames others whenever she or Bill get into trouble concerning their behavior.
Agreed. There are far better subjects to hit her on that will have more impact. But that doesn't mean Trump won't do it.
I agree. This is important but a side issue. Hillary’s treatment of just Juanita Broderick cements her status as officially an anti-woman abuser. But, you’re right, it will only bring Hillary sympathy and will divert attention from the true issues at hand. Just IMHO.
It’s almost inconceivable that his advisors (especially Conway) are not strongly advising against this line of attack, when (as you say) there are so many other ripe avenues of attack that concern Americans more.
Will he listen?
Being nice to the Bitch of Benghazi never works. Just look at the way she treats all those she considers beneath her, which is probably everyone.
Yeah, cause chelsea has never heard anything about her rat filth father's infidelities.
Next time she accuses him of being mean to women, he should just calmly say that we all know your and your husbands history with his hundreds of girlfriends and your treatment of them and that’s all I’m going to say. Now, back to the immigration issue. He really needs to hit her on her unfittness to be president due to her server, her aids all taking the 5th and the destruction of evidence and all the rest of that. He needs to point out that she was SOS while all this was going on. Pound her on it. The nerve of her saying he had something to hide because he hasn’t put out his tax return.
He can do both.
The $10,000 question.
The media is bad at calling his bluffs.
Their faces say it all.
All he has to say is...."This coming from you?" and look pointedly at Billy Boy.
We're just having a little fun. For a change, we have a candidate willing to fight back and it's so refreshing that we're posting all our pent up comments from the last 20 years!
Why deny us that pleasure?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.