Never heard of the site before. The left must be having a ‘seizure’ over their loss of the narrative.
I’ve been watching Bloomberg to avoid CNN’s endless Trump-trashing in recent weeks, but today, there is no financial news more important than attacking Trump, calling him a liar, dishonest, ets, etc.
CRACKED used to be a very heavily trafficked humor site, but over the last two years has become increasingly political.
As a result, hits have decreased dramatically.
I would be shocked if they dared criticized Hillary. Humor sites and comedians believe they get a pass because they view politics as secondary. See Jon Stewart. It is a source of info for the lazy.
“... a presidential candidate forming an alliance with a media website in itself is pretty weird,...”
What does he have to say about Clinton having an alliance with Politico, CNN, MSNBC, ABC, CBS, NBC, NYT, WaPo, etc., etc., including his own website? I guess he thinks if you have an alliance with one website it’s odd, but to have a multifaceted alliance with lots of outlets, it’s OK.
But I guess Hillary and CNN, MSNBC, ABC, CBS, NBC, Daily Beast, Huffington Post etc etc etc is just fine?
Really? Who cares what the nattering slobber donkeys at cracked say? That’s akin to worrying about how Alfred E. Newman is voting.
Why aren't I 225% ahead?
Hmmm...’humor’ sites seem to be turning into Das Kapital with regularity these days.
The bolts are coming loose
The fact that Trump makes them so unhinged increases my desire to see him as President
It’s no longer a humor site. It’s a SJW listicle site.
They are truly ‘cracked’ if they think they’re even relevant.
I don’t care what cracked thinks about anything. Is it a DU spinoff?
Then I guess Hillary’s alliance with CNN, MSNBC, ABC, CBS, NBC, Univision, etc. is off-the-charts insane.
Breitbart has never been, nor will ever be the same without Andrew.
Cracked? Isn’t that the unfunny competitor of MAD?