[papertyger]

It’s a good show. He’s explaining what happened and how the idiots in Washington & NYC interpreted it.

Not to mention a few FReepers like me....

I've never been so happy to be wrong!

[miss marmelstein]

But he keeps going to this memo that his supporters will never abandon him. Trump, of course, needs more than people like me and it seems Rush is unwilling to say he has more support than just his most staunch supporters. Am I wrong in this?

[Political Junkie Too]

If there is anything close to a gaffe that liberals may try to gin up, it would be Trump's answer on "fist strike" with nuclear weapons. However, it is a double-edged sword that can cut both ways.

Trump was trying to defuse the attack that he cannot be trusted with the "nuclear codes" by saying he won't start a nuclear war because convential weapons can do the job.

Clinton will say (and did last night) that it shows that Trump doesn't understand our mutual defense treaties with our allies. Clinton said "I will honor our agreements."

Does this mean that Clinton would start a nuclear war? How will the anti-nuke anti-war Left respond to that? How will the Left reconcile "Trump can't be trusted with the codes" with "Clinton CAN be trusted to first-strike a nuclear attack?"

-PJ