I’m hoping that now Trump will personally tell people about ICANN, Hillary’s internet gatekeeper, what she’s always wanted.
I don’t know if he will tie it to her, but Madam Albright’s consulting firm assisted lobbying efforts for ICANN’s transition.
Also, the Clintons have been very chummy with China, and so has ICANN.
Cruz is DEAD-ON RIGHT about ICANN and helped expose their relationship with China.
I’ll post how easy it is to explain why ICANN is dangerous in a post to ‘all’.
FRegards ....
Easy To Explain — WHY ICANN is dangerous
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/3472522/posts
This is the quick way to explain why ICANN is so dangerous.
They essentially ‘govern’ the TLDs [top level domains].
Each TLD [such as .com or .org] runs its own ‘phone directory’.
And ICANN controls them through ‘Registry Operator Code of Conduct’.
Right now ICANN is subject to US law, mainly because its headquarters are in the US. But if ICANN’s contract isn’t renewed, it’s free to move overseas [which it secretly plans to] and modify its ‘Registry Operator Code of Conduct’ for each dot-com or dot-org or ...
... theoretically even our military websites.
From October on through to a republican president, there’s no telling how much the White House will coordinate with ICANN in the name of ‘no controlling legal authority’.
[In other words — Hillary will have her gatekeeper if she wins, and Obama might too for a few months.]