[Mariner]

The ICANN transfer present no risk, none, to the Internet or those who use it or publish on it.

I've been in the business for 40 years and you can either take my word for it, or do your own research.

Or, remain ignorant like a democrat.

[Freedom56v2]

Gee thanks for trolling the thread...

There have been numerous articles written on the subject that have been posted here on multiple threads that refute your position, so perhaps you should do some more research or just let us be active on this issue without your snark comments like being an ignorant democrat. So helpful...NOT

Congress has prevented this move for at least 2 years, so let’s encourage them to prevent this transfer once again until we have a President who actually believes in the sovereignty of the United States.

[Chode]

why are the RATS so intent on giving it up then?

[ConservativeMind]

What is to stop ICANN from forcing $1,000 a domain name for US residents and companies, or disallowing a domain name for any and every reason? They could have this set up as a UN tax, funded solely by the US.

IP addresses would still work, if you could remember them, but that completely takes away the benefit of URLs.

[The Westerner]

Hi Mariner,
I appreciate your enthusiastic response and find your argument interesting. I would hope you are 100% correct. In the meantime, this was an attempt to create a list for future reference. That’s all.
T.W.