Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Congressman Mike Rogers Introduces Bill to Get U.S. Out of UN
The New American ^ | 12 June 2015 | Alex Newman

Posted on 09/13/2016 6:23:36 AM PDT by VitacoreVision

Citing wasted tax dollars and attacks on the constitutionally guaranteed liberties of the American people, Rep. Mike Rogers (R-Ala.; shown) introduced a bill to restore U.S. sovereignty and withdraw from the United Nations. The effort to de-fund and exit the UN comes amid growing scrutiny of the global organization, often ridiculed as the “dictators club,” and myriad mega-scandals swirling around it. However, despite ever-growing support in Congress for restoring U.S. sovereignty by withdrawing from the UN over the years, the legislation still faces an uphill battle.

In a statement last week announcing the American Sovereignty Restoration Act of 2015 (H.R. 1205), Rep. Rogers noted that many of his constituents in East Alabama would likely agree with his position that U.S. government participation in the UN should end immediately. “The U.N. continues to prove it’s an inefficient bureaucracy and a complete waste of American tax dollars,” the congressman said, echoing widespread concerns about the international outfit expressed across America and worldwide.

“Why should the American taxpayer bankroll an international organization that works against America’s interests around the world?” asked Rep. Rogers. “The time is now to restore and protect American sovereignty and get out of the United Nations.” He cited attacks on U.S. liberties as a key motivation for the legislation.

Several other liberty-minded congressmen have also sponsored the legislation including constitutionalist Rep. Thomas Massie (R-Ky.), Rep. John Duncan (R-Tenn.), Rep. Lynn Westmoreland (R-Ga.), and Rep. Tim Huelskamp (R-Kan.). A previous bill to withdraw from the UN introduced in the last Congress by then-Rep. Paul Broun (R-Ga.) garnered nine co-sponsors. With the regime ruling Communist China increasingly taking a leading role at the UN, among numerous other concerns, opposition to the global body is expected to continue growing.

If approved, the legislation would repeal the UN Participation Act of 1945 and shutter the U.S. government’s mission to the outfit. It would also “terminate all membership by the United States in the United Nations, and in any organ, specialized agency, commission, or other formally affiliated body of the United Nations.” That specifically includes UNESCO, which President Ronald Reagan withdrew from, along with the World Health Organization, the UN Environment Program (UNEP), and more. It would end all U.S. involvement in all UN conventions and agreements, too.   

The proposed law, introduced in numerous legislative session of Congress in recent decades, would also end all funding to the UN and all of its agencies — with the estimated savings to taxpayers reaching into the billions per year, and potentially even more. The legislation also aims to end all U.S. military involvement in UN military “peacekeeping” schemes and ban U.S. troops from serving under UN command. Finally, the bill would seek to evict the UN and its dictator-infested headquarters from U.S. soil. It would also ban any use of American government facilities by the global outfit, while stripping UN bureaucrats and dignitaries of diplomatic immunity.

Rep. Rogers pointed to a wide range of reasons why the U.S. should dump the UN. “Although the United States makes up almost a quarter of the U.N.’s annual budget, the U.N. has attempted a number of actions that attack our rights as U.S. citizens,” he explained. “To name a few, these initiatives include actions like the Law of the Sea Treaty, which would subject our country to internationally-based environmental mandates, costing American businesses more money, or the U.N.’s work to re-establish an international regulation regime on global warming which would heavily target our fossil fuels.”

Indeed, especially in recent years, the UN has become increasingly brazen in attacking the rights of Americans, and even the U.S. Constitution that enshrines those unalienable rights. From attacks on free speech and gun rights to assaults on America’s federalist system of government and states’ rights, the UN and its member regimes have become increasingly aggressive. Now, the UN is working on a series of major schemes that would undermine even the principles upon which the United States was founded, much of it under the guise of promoting pseudo-human rights and pseudo-environmentalism.

Rep. Rogers took special aim at a UN gun treaty that has become a lightning rod for bipartisan opposition across America. “The U.N. has also offered a potential Arms Trade Treaty which would threaten our Second Amendment rights and impose regulations on our gun manufacturers, who are already facing regulations and pressure from the Obama Administration,” Rogers explained. That treaty, ATT for short, would purport to require gun registration and eventually strict controls, with the ultimate aim of disarming civilians.

The UN’s perceived anti-Israel bias, which some critics have even dubbed systemic anti-Semitism, also attracted criticism from Rep. Rogers. “Lastly, the U.N. does not support Israel and voted to grant the Palestinian Authority ‘non-member state’ permanent observer status,” he argued. “Anyone who is not a friend to our ally Israel, is not a friend to the United States.” Even some globalist neo-con senators such as Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) have threatened the UN over its apparent hostility to Israel, and the outrage continues to grow.

For the reasons cited above, “among others,” Rep. Rogers said, he introduced the American Sovereignty Restoration Act. By introducing the bill in this session, the congressman from Alabama continues the long and valiant effort by lawmakers to get the U.S. government out of the UN. Former Rep. Ron Paul (R-Texas), a GOP presidential candidate last election and a hero of many liberty-minded and constitutionalist Americans, first introduced the bill in 1997, when it garnered 54 supporters. The next time it was voted on, support had drastically increased.    

While anti-UN sentiment is fierce and growing across much of America, in Alabama, where the legislation’s lead sponsor comes from, that animosity is especially pronounced. In 2012, for example, both houses of the state legislature voted unanimously to ban the deeply controversial UN “sustainable development” program known as Agenda 21 in what was hailed as a major victory for property rights and sovereignty. Since then, UN meddling in American affairs has accelerated dramatically, sparking even more outrage about the global organization across Alabama and beyond.

In the U.S. Senate, pro-sovereignty sentiment is also growing. Earlier this year, Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.), a leading contender for the 2016 nomination, blasted the UN and suggested it should be dismantled. “I dislike paying for something that two-bit Third World countries with no freedom attack us and complain about the United States,” explained the senator, who is also Ron Paul’s son. “There’s a lot of reasons why I don’t like the UN, and I think I’d be happy to dissolve it.”

The American public generally shares those sentiments, with a 2014 Gallup poll showing that a staggering 57 percent of Americans believed the UN was doing a “bad job,” versus 37 percent who thought it was doing a “good job.” More than two thirds of Americans were upset with the UN, and independents were also overwhelmingly opposed. But even among Democrats, half thought the UN was doing a bad job. The Obama administration, meanwhile, apparently out of step with the American people, has called for drastically expanding and empowering the UN and its scandal-plagued military forces.

The legislation to withdraw U.S. participation in the UN is currently sitting in the House Foreign Affairs Committee chaired by Rep. Edward “Ed” Royce (R-Calif.), who will play a key role in deciding whether it moves on to the full House for a vote by the American people’s elected representatives. Americans who support U.S. sovereignty and the U.S. Constitution should urge their representatives to take action.

As efforts to fully restore U.S. sovereignty proceed, though, the Republican Congress should completely de-fund the UN in the meantime. Without action, the increasingly powerful and lawless UN will continue seeking to further empower itself at American expense — trampling on liberty and sovereignty in the process.

Related articles:

Sen. Rand Paul Would be “Happy to Dissolve” the UN

Get the US out of the UN: Concerned Citizen Persuades Congressman

United Nations Exploits Pseudo-“Human Rights” to Attack U.S.

Bulgarian Communist Is Now “Frontrunner” to Lead UN

Whistleblower Targeted for Exposing UN Troops Raping Children

UN Seeks to Criminalize Free Speech, Citing “Human Rights”

UN Unveils Plot to Reduce African Population

UN-backed Forces Slaughter Christians in Ivory Coast

Obama Budget Supersizes U.S. Funding for UN, Global Military

China: Staking Claim in the New World Order

Merry Christmas: UN Declares Arms Trade Treaty to Go Into Effect Dec. 24

The United Nations: On the Brink of Becoming a World Government


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 114th; 2016issues; agenda21; amexit; mikerogers; un; uncorrupt; unexitbill; usoutofun
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-51 next last
E-mail Congress!

Support #Amexit to Get US Out! of the UN


1 posted on 09/13/2016 6:23:37 AM PDT by VitacoreVision
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: VitacoreVision

YES!!


2 posted on 09/13/2016 6:25:03 AM PDT by Thom Pain (If you like your country you can keep it. Period. REPEAL 17 !! & 14!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VitacoreVision

Mike Rogers just made my good list


3 posted on 09/13/2016 6:26:47 AM PDT by Eddie01 (Democrats are the Liquidate America Party)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Thom Pain

Great try Congressman Rogers but the efforts will go no where. Plus, odumbo would veto it immediately should it pass.


4 posted on 09/13/2016 6:27:28 AM PDT by DaveA37
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: VitacoreVision
Congressman Mike Rogers Introduces Bill to Get U.S. Out of UN

Well, there is good news occasionally.

5 posted on 09/13/2016 6:27:40 AM PDT by Navy Patriot (America, a Rule of Mob nation)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Navy Patriot

Don’t you think Trump will take care of that? Elect him first.


6 posted on 09/13/2016 6:29:14 AM PDT by DIRTYSECRET (urope. Why do they put up with this.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Thom Pain

Double YES !!!!!


7 posted on 09/13/2016 6:31:50 AM PDT by BuffaloJack (Own a rifle. Be an American.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: VitacoreVision

Because Obama will probably be the next Secretary-General of the UN.


8 posted on 09/13/2016 6:37:36 AM PDT by \/\/ayne (I regret that I have but one subscription cancellation notice to give to my local newspaper.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VitacoreVision
Not going to happen.
But what we *could* do is to stop signing treaties that put the US at a disadvantage, and stop giving UN them money for wasteful projects, especially all the poverty-extending programs they're running all over the world.

9 posted on 09/13/2016 6:40:29 AM PDT by BitWielder1 (I'd rather have Unequal Wealth than Equal Poverty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DaveA37

PRyno could cut off funding.....


10 posted on 09/13/2016 6:40:46 AM PDT by Paladin2 (auto spelchk? BWAhaha2haaa.....I aint't likely fixin' nuttin'. Blame it on the Bossa Nova...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: BitWielder1

BitWielder1: Not going to happen.
...

The UN just picked a fight with Trump. Trump supporters can take the UN down.

UN “Human Rights” Boss Equates Trump, Farage With ISIS
09 September 2016
http://www.thenewamerican.com/world-news/europe/item/24026-in-bizarre-meltdown-un-leader-equates-trump-with-isis


11 posted on 09/13/2016 6:45:10 AM PDT by VitacoreVision
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: VitacoreVision

“the United States makes up almost a quarter of the U.N.’s annual budget, the U.N”

Why? There is close to 200 members. We should be paying about 1/20th of the annual budget...start there.


12 posted on 09/13/2016 6:46:12 AM PDT by Leep (Hillary Clinton does not approve of this message.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VitacoreVision; knighthawk

US out of the UN
UN out of the US


13 posted on 09/13/2016 6:47:00 AM PDT by NonValueAdded (#DeplorableMe #BitterClinger)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VitacoreVision

So here’s the downside of that:

The US is currently one of the permanent members of the Security Council, with veto power. If we exit the UN, we lose that element of control, which means a couple of things:

First, we hang Israel out to dry. The US is generally the only voice in the UN supporting them, and frequently has to exercise its veto to override UN resolutions condemning or otherwise attacking Israel.

Second, we open ourselves up to all kinds of hassle. If we’re not participating, and not able to block other nations from imposing their petty vendettas against us, any two-bit tinhorn dictatorship can impose UN sanctions on the US. It’s easy to dismiss such concern, given the general ineffectiveness of the UN, but the US depends on a lot of the world to handle the production and service of its economy, and buy its debt. It would be very easy for our “partners” to use UN influence to restructure their relationships with us to be more favorable to their side, and we’d have little to no recourse.

I’m all for pushing the UN offshore, and for scaling back our financial support of an organization that has little interest in favoring our interests, but we should not relinquish our own influence.


14 posted on 09/13/2016 6:48:19 AM PDT by Little Pig
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VitacoreVision

Rogers of Alabama has been a Yes vote on all the assorted trades deals during his tenure including TPP. He wasn’t worried about US sovereignty during all those votes.

I don’t know if he has serious Democrat opposition, but this bill will go nowhere and looks like something to try and score a few phony sovereignty points, sort of like Rove and W throwing out a constitutional amendment to ban gay marriage in February of 2004, that had no chance of passage, as a sop to conservatives. Now what was going on in 2004?


15 posted on 09/13/2016 6:53:10 AM PDT by Will88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VitacoreVision

Finally someone with some balls in Congress.


16 posted on 09/13/2016 6:53:26 AM PDT by WKUHilltopper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VitacoreVision

YES, YES, and Oh Hell YEAH!


17 posted on 09/13/2016 7:00:29 AM PDT by lexington minuteman 1775
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Thom Pain

“”Rep. Rogers noted that many of his constituents in East Alabama would likely agree with his position that U.S. government participation in the UN should end immediately.””

It would be a dream come true. Why on earth is he not including the entire state of AL - constituents in East Alabama??? I think the whole country would be in favor!!! I would hope it would include CLOSING UP SHOP and moving elsewhere!

Tell the 47% it would mean money saved and more welfare for them to get them on board.


18 posted on 09/13/2016 7:03:58 AM PDT by Thank You Rush
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Will88

I’m not promoting Mike Rogers, I’m just supporting this Bill and similar bills.


19 posted on 09/13/2016 7:08:04 AM PDT by VitacoreVision
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Will88
A table where members of Congress voting records on trade can be checked.

Congressional Trade Voting Records

20 posted on 09/13/2016 7:08:48 AM PDT by Will88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-51 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson