Why do you think that government mandated blockchain compliance won’t force key encrypted software with immediate transmission to the blockchain?
The machines that exist today will NOT be compliant.
You’ve been saying over and over again in reference to things that exist today TODAY.
Try thinking ‘design & development’ of a secure system which the Australians are implementing.
Because you’re in apples and chickens land. Immediate transmission to the blockchain doesn’t force the data being transmitted to be valid. Blockchain does nothing other than keep the transmitted data from being messed with DURING transmission, it does nothing to validate the data it’s handed.
Actually I’m referencing basic software design and what the specs actually mean. I am thinking design and development, which is why I understand that blockchain does NOTHING to prevent data tampering BEFORE the chain.
Problem here is you’ve got an EPA solution. For years and years and years the EPA has been saying the 90% of vehicular pollution is caused by 10% of cars that never pass emissions testing, and yet their solution to reduce vehicular pollution is to increase emissions standards making the tests harder to pass. Voter fraud mostly does not happen during data transmission. It happens in data CREATION, both through fraudulent voters on the rolls, and fraudulent votes being cast. And blockchain does not fix any of those problems. It can’t it’s not in the right point of the process. Australia is putting in smoke alarms and hoping they prevent fires.
If you want to end voter fraud step 1 is to fix the damn voter roles. Well really step 1 is to break the dem-GOP monopoly because in this they are united, they like voter fraud, they both engage in it to ensure their base. Which is why neither of them ever allows the voter roles to get cleaned up. Blockchain’s not going to solve any of that.