And there you just admitted that there IS a database and there IS a distribution of validation. And now you’ve admitted again that the system won’t solve the primary ways voter fraud happens.
Just like I said at the beginning. This is solving problems that don’t exist and not touching known problems that have been used to fix elections for as long as elections have existed.
There is no database, no need for one.
And the registration problems were never mentioned to be addressed by the blockchain. Those problems are addressed by Voter ID and voter roll cleanup. Those are separate issues.
Block-Chain Technology prohibits electronic fraud by securing a vote with a key encryption and transmitting immediately to a matched encryptor on the blockchain.
A voter can see their vote on the blockchain immediately.
One a vote is on the blockchain, it can’t be changed. Once a voter sees how they voted on the blockchain, they know their vote is secure.
I described the registration process in detail in many comments. I didn't describe it in every comment and then you jump on one comment and assume that it uses a database. It does not. It is incorrect to say it needs a database. It calculates a hash of information (name, physical address, etc) and looks that hash up in the blockchain to make sure the person is not already registered. Of course there can be fraud at that point by the registrar, the voter or both. The blockchain cannot stop that or solve that.
But there is no database. No database to be hacked surreptitiously anyway, just the blockchain holding the data and that cannot be hacked.