Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Red Steel

Queen Hillary does not have to explain herself to you deplorable people!

Her royal eyes are offended by your deplorable looks.

Her royal nose is offended by your deplorable smell.

And your deplorable grunts and squawks are also offensive.

Go back to your baskets and leave the Queen alone!


44 posted on 09/10/2016 7:56:55 PM PDT by blueunicorn6 ("A crack shot and a good dancer")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: blueunicorn6
Guistra is full of crap.

This is unbelievable.

Read this crooked bastards statement below.

What good work does the "Clinton Foundation " do anyway?

NOTHING

An article published in the New York Times (“Cash Flowed to Clinton Foundation Amid Russian Uranium Deal” April 23, 2015) suggests that my contributions to the Clinton Foundation were made to further my business interests.

This is not true! I support the work of the Clinton Foundation because I believe in the Clinton Foundation’s mission and effectiveness. The world is a better place because of it. As a philanthropist, I am extremely proud of the significant work we do to help thousands of people all over the world. We are truly changing lives.

I would like to take this opportunity to explain and clarify some of the questions that have been raised.

Some media outlets have asked us why we have not publicly disclosed the donors that have contributed to the Canadian charity – the Clinton Giustra Enterprise Partnership (Canada). The Clinton Giustra Enterprise Partnership (Canada)’s Board has followed Canadian laws and Canadian charitable best practices where donors have a right and an expectation of privacy which we have respected as a Canadian charity. We will not share or publicly disclose our donor’s information unless we received prior written consent.

Journalists have challenged this and have claimed we do not need to provide donors the right to privacy. Therefore, we have sought advice from our Canadian legal counsel and received a legal opinion which supports our statement, as per Canadian laws and Canadian charitable best practices, that donors have a right and an expectation of privacy.

In addition, we have also sought independent legal advice from a leading practitioner in Canadian charity law and expect a second legal opinion to be forthcoming in the following days and which will be posted on the FAQs page of our web-site. Even though there is no formal requirement to disclose our donors, in light of these inquires, we are reaching out to our major donors requesting consent to publicly recognize their contribution.

47 posted on 09/10/2016 8:01:00 PM PDT by Rome2000 (SMASH THE CPUSA-SIC SEMPER TYRANNIS-CLOSE ALL MOSQUES)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies ]

To: blueunicorn6

You guys have got me laughing tonight! You’re on a roll.


115 posted on 09/10/2016 10:04:24 PM PDT by lee martell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson