The Kremlin Really Believes That Hillary Wants to Start a War With Russia

Foreign Policy.com ^ | September 7, 2016 | Clinton Ehrlich

[Ohioan]

You are too kind. Putting America first is no different that parental love for a child. It flows from similar concepts; indeed is partially rooted in the Fifth Commandment. Any Federal Office holder who does not put America first, has violated their oath of office; has betrayed the most sacred trust. Calling such loathsome reprobate a "Globalist," masks the actual level of culpability.

As my article linked above argues, there is no way to read the Constitution, and not see that it requires putting America First, if you are a Federal Office Holder. If Hillary is so full of hatred for her own heritage that she is unable to see that; that is the controlling issue for many of us--even if she were not otherwise unfit for office.

[Always A Marine]

I agree that Hillary Clinton is a warmonger, as are more than a few of her fellow-travelling Globalists who hide in the Republican Party. What unites the Globalists against Donald Trump is that Trump is a nationalist who opposes their vision of a borderless world. I was mistaken to have supported Ted Cruz despite his pro-TPP and squishy border positions, and am thankful that Trump won the nomination.

[Gideon300]

“I can’t believe anyone is stupid enough to start a war with Russia.
Not even Hillary!.”

I believe she could, and would. She’s a power-mad wannabe dictator champing at the bit to show the world a woman can be just as strong and as mean as any man. “Hear me roar!” Her ego would prevent her doing anything else.

Compared to the muzzie threat there is very little ideological difference between the US and Russia. As rough around the edges as we may see the Russians, they would make much better friends than enemies. China seems hell-bent on becoming competitive for the world’s most powerful military. When that happens it would be to our treat advantage to have Russia on our side rather than theirs.

[GrandJediMasterYoda]

Don’t forget: If it wasn’t for the media, she would be in jail right now and nowhere near running for President. Try to imagine if they treated the Clintons the way they treated Nixon. If this woman wins this election, every American citizen who loves this country should absolutely boycott the ENTIRE media establishment. Half this country leans right, that’s 160 million people. No more CBS, NBC, ABC even Fox news who have been attacking Trump regularly now on orders of Rupert Murdoch. Do not watch their TV shows, do not visit their websites, think of every possibly way they make money and completely eliminate it from your life.

[ETL]

It was the Soros-supported demonRats that appeased Putin on such critical things as missile defense and the NewSTART nuke deal, as well as the Iran nuke deal.

Aug 2015

___________________________________________________

From Real Clear Politics, Sept 10, 2015...

"In a 2014 New Yorker interview, Obama said his goal was to create a 'new equilibrium' in the Middle East.

In the short run, at least, his signature diplomatic undertaking can be counted on to bring more violence to this volatile region.

The Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action, as the [Obama-Putin Iran deal] agreement is formally known, provides the world's leading state sponsor of terrorism an infusion of somewhere in the neighborhood of $100 billion of unfrozen assets and a great deal more of continuing revenues as businesses and governments around the world rush to profit from oil-and-gas-rich Iran's reintegration into the world economy.

The agreement relaxes the international isolation of the Islamic Republic and ratifies Tehran's status as a nuclear threshold state. And it relieves restrictions on Iran's acquisition of weapons, including ballistic missiles. ..."

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2015/09/10/iran_deal_throws_sparks_on_mideast_tinderbox_128034.html

[realcleanguy]

Good Article, and yes it appears Hillary is laying the groundwork to declare war on Russia and do to Russia what she helped do in Egypt, Libya, Yemen and Syria. War is what she wants. Destroying the nations and the world is her goal. She is a danger to all mankind

[Mamzelle]

Since Putin could remove Soros at any time, I doubt the reasoning here.

[exDemMom]

Well, look at the way Hillary destabilized the entire Middle East, all because she apparently had a grudge against Muammar Khaddafi (for what reason, we will probably never know).

The way she is talking about Putin and Russia, we have reason to be concerned. Her finger will be on the nuclear button, and she is notoriously unstable. Could she decide to take drastic action against Moscow, for her own twisted reasons?

Russia is no longer the belligerent of the Soviet Union. We have every reason in the world to continue dialog with them in a civilized manner. Trump is the person to keep that dialog going.

[silentknight]

If Hillary wins we go to war with Russia

If Trump wins we go to war with Islam.

You decide.

[silentknight]

I should add this

We go to war with Islam in some attempt to fix what Hitlery and Obambi did to the Middle East.

[trisham]

Trump.

"On June 16th, when we started this journey, there were 17 candidates.
I was told by everybody, 'Do not go to Iowa. You could never finish even in the
top ten.' And I said, 'But I have friends in Iowa. I know a lot of people in Iowa.
I think they'll really like me. Let's give it a shot.' They said, 'Don't do
it.' I said, 'I have to do it.' And, we finished second,
and I want to tell you something,

I'm just honored, I'm really honored."

Donald Trump
Iowa 2/1/16

[Little Ray]

Have gotten tired of American lives and treasure being spent abroad for ingrates who ruin everything we try to do for them (either the locals or our own State Department), I would be happy to see China and Russia trying to pick up the pieces.
Let them go broke and wear out THEIR armed forces.
And it would be extinction level events for the ingrates in the ME when they PO the Chinese or Russians.

[McGruff]

She’d probably want John McCain as her Secretary of Defense. He’s just itching to start WW-III.

[sergeantdave]

Hillary is insane, and it’s our duty to bring her down this November.

[Bobalu]

[Sam Gamgee]

I actually thought she turned into a hawkish Republican when she said that about Russia. I thought most liberals loved the remnants of the old Soviet republic now that Putin is turning the page back 100 years.

I doubt she would actually do anything than be Putin’s lap dog in reality. She was trying to appeal to Russian doubters among Republicans and moderates.

[Sam Gamgee]

I still think Russia needs to be put in its rightful place at least diplomatically. They do fund terrorism and Iran after all, so need to be held to account.

[ReaganGeneration2]

“follow the money”

Agreed!
(a) Putin probably didn’t donate to the Crime Family.
(b) Anti-Assad nation-states in the Middle East did

No doubt power is also involved. A war helps raise her stature and power to new heights.

Many people’s greatest apprehension with Trump is he’s “unhinged”. Trump can win over these millions by being anti-war-with Putin or Assad, or China for that matter.

[Ancesthntr]

“Compared to the muzzie threat there is very little ideological difference between the US and Russia. As rough around the edges as we may see the Russians, they would make much better friends than enemies.”

---

I grew up near the Lakehurst NAS, Ft. Dix and McGuire AFB complex (it covers much of central NJ). ALL of that was leased to Russia in the late 1800s and early 1900s as a test firing range - they’d test their artillery with the brand-new DuPont powder from just over the river in Delaware.

The point being that we and the Russians were friendly with each other. The only thing that divided us during the 20th Century was Communism - i.e. ideology. We are natural allies - Western, mostly Christian, nations striding over continents, with interests throughout the world, with (mostly) well-educated and ambitious people who enjoy the benefits of scientific research and the new technology it provides. We value stability - why screw with a world system that largely works for us?

There is no reason for us to be at odds. They have their sphere of influence, we have ours. The have their allies and enemies, we have ours. Some of our enemies (present or potential) are common to both - Islam and China, to cite the 2 800-pound gorillas in the room. We should be easily able to sit down with their leaders and basically carve the world up into spheres of influence (not control, mind you, but influence), with rules about stepping over those lines (like “never” or “only if attacked by one of those countries” - the diplomats can work out the details). We SHOULD cooperate vs. various enemies, and we SHOULD increase trade that benefits both countries. We’d have to agree to less spying on each other - and both mean it and make it stick. The goal would be to move from the present position of wary adversaries, to wary allies, and then to actual friends. This will take time, effort and some degree of trust (of the “trust, but verify” sort), but it is very doable.

But not under Clinton. She is unstable, uninformed and arrogant, and the single biggest risk factor for a world war if elected.

[ETL]

Both the islamo-nazis AND a re-emergent expansionist Russia under KGB Putin are threats to the US.