Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Colin Powell: Using private email same as private phone call
Associated Press ^ | Sep 8, 2016 6:26 PM EDT | Michael Biesecker

Posted on 09/08/2016 5:15:01 PM PDT by Olog-hai

Former Secretary of State Colin Powell found himself on the defensive Thursday following the release of a 2009 email exchange with Hillary Clinton, describing his use of a private, dial-up email account to carry out government business.

Powell’s antiquated AOL account, which worked over a phone line in his office at the State Department, might have been more vulnerable to attack by hackers than the private email server the Clinton used during her tenure as secretary.

Powell said in a statement he viewed his use of private email to communicate with foreign leaders and senior U.S. officials as private conversations similar to phone calls. He said he was unaware of any requirement that those messages be preserved as government records, potentially subject to public release.

“I have been interviewed by the State Department (Inspector General) and the FBI about my actions and decisions,” Powell said Thursday. “I stand by my decisions and I am fully accountable.” …

(Excerpt) Read more at hosted.ap.org ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: hillary; powell; privateemail; privateserver
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-36 last
To: Timpanagos1
But at the State Department in 2009?

No, that's when he sent Clinton an email about it, AFTER she was already using her private system to evade the FOIA.

Powell was SoS from 2001 to 2005.

21 posted on 09/08/2016 5:36:21 PM PDT by justlurking
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

Bottom line is that Colin Powell was way over paid and appointed over his intellect. I didn’t like him from the time he stopped us from taking out Saddam the first time, through his endorsement of Barack “The Black President”, through all his lefty tripe.

This revelation that he was an idiot with his email and state secrets further solidifies what I think of Colin Bowell.


22 posted on 09/08/2016 5:40:23 PM PDT by FreeAtlanta (what a mess we got ourselves into)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

I doubt there were doing nearly as much communicating via email 20 years ago as today. Heck, fax machines still existed. Blackberry wasn’t even introduced until 1999.


23 posted on 09/08/2016 5:40:35 PM PDT by proust (Trump / Pence 2016!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

And you don’t discuss classified information over a nonsecure line. You don’t even hold a classified discussion in the same room with a nonsecure phone. No wireless phones, period. Landlines have to be unplugged from the line. So his comment is irrelevant.


24 posted on 09/08/2016 5:44:34 PM PDT by ThunderSleeps (Stop obarma now! Stop the hussein - insane agenda!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cboldt

Powell was also Secretary of State almost a decade before Hillary. During that time, almost all private enterprises and governmental organizations evolved from email in-boxes that resided on individual machines to centralized email servers that stored and retained records. Indeed, Dodd-Frank and other regulatory actions in the 2000’s mandated that corporations store and retain email records.

What was a marginal practice by Colin Powell in 2001 was outright criminal evasion by Hillary Clinton in 2011.

Be to be completely fair, I’m willing to say both Powell and Clinton are unfit to serve as President.


25 posted on 09/08/2016 5:46:44 PM PDT by CaptainMorgantown
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

Lock them BOTH up.

Hillary using his criminal behavior to justify her own just doesn’t cut it, and Republican’s shouldn’t fall for this.

Lock them BOTH up.


26 posted on 09/08/2016 6:06:24 PM PDT by Bubba Gump Shrimp (A Liberal is someone who cannot accept that there is a Law of Unintended Consequences)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: butlerweave

Lock his butt up


27 posted on 09/08/2016 6:08:00 PM PDT by personalaccts (Is George W going to protect the border?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

If anyone should know better, it’s a retired 4 star general. Lock both their azzes up.


28 posted on 09/08/2016 6:10:47 PM PDT by TADSLOS (Vote Trump. Defeat the Clinton Crime Syndicate. Reset America.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FreeAtlanta

I’m ashamed I defended just about everyone from the Bush Administration.


29 posted on 09/08/2016 6:13:00 PM PDT by CommieCutter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Bubba Gump Shrimp

You’re right. Lock them both up.


30 posted on 09/08/2016 6:13:58 PM PDT by CommieCutter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: All
-
I cannot give permission to the guy on the corner to go into someone's house and take their stuff at 2:00 am.

That guy is still a criminal burglar.

Many employees didn't have email a decade earlier when Powell was in office. He was her predecessor like Richard Nixon was Barack Obama's.

Hillary wouldn't use encrypted devices (hardware) as required. This issue is being avoided.


31 posted on 09/08/2016 6:48:34 PM PDT by AnthonySoprano
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Theoria

Until they turn


32 posted on 09/08/2016 6:54:18 PM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (Embrace the Lion of Judah and He will roar for you and teach you to roar too. See my page.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: proust

Hillary is a lawyer. Powell is not a lawyer.

Only a very stupid lawyer (or a very crooked lawyer) asks a person who is not a lawyer for legal advice.

This is worse than bad judgment.

And I am certain that Hillary had to dodge a small army of State Department and other government lawyers to get the answer she wanted, presuming the question and answer is relevant at all.


33 posted on 09/08/2016 7:01:57 PM PDT by SteveH
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: SteveH

She’s trying to play smart and dumb at the same time, and her base is just glugging back that Kool Aid like it was the best thing in the world.


34 posted on 09/08/2016 7:19:11 PM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (Embrace the Lion of Judah and He will roar for you and teach you to roar too. See my page.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: HiTech RedNeck

colon proves again what a political hack and loser he is.


35 posted on 09/08/2016 10:56:24 PM PDT by hal ogen (First Amendment or Reeducation Camp?.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

How the FBI Went Easy on Hillary Clinton
Published September 9, 2016

By Paul Sperry, The New York Post

It’s clear now the FBI conducted a sweetheart investigation into Hillary Clinton’s e-mail shenanigans that appears to have been fixed from the start to go nowhere.

Far from exonerating Clinton, the nearly 60 pages of documents expose both the systematic destruction of subpoenaed evidence by Clinton’s aides and the curious lack of interest by investigators in recovering it.

Agents also failed to resolve unanswered questions, reconcile contradictory testimony or sweat uncooperative witnesses.

Comey declared the investigation free of undue influence three days after his agents interviewed Clinton at FBI headquarters under special terms. Agents weren’t allowed to Mirandize Clinton or place her under oath, even though she was the subject of a criminal investigation possibly involving espionage. They weren’t even allowed to record her answers.

What’s more, Comey made the two FBI agents who interviewed Clinton — along with all agents and forensic analysts involved in the so-called investigation — sign non-disclosure agreements gagging them from talking about the case even with other employees.

Comey even let Clinton’s State Department aides Cheryl Mills and Heather Samuelson sit in on the interview with Clinton’s other lawyers, despite the glaring conflict of interest. FBI documents make clear Mills and Samuelson led the effort to search and destroy Clinton’s subpoenaed e-mails and should’ve been prime targets of the investigation.

Comey didn’t even attend her interview and, per his testimony, only read a “summary” of it.

The FBI failed to pursue even the most basic lines of questioning. When Clinton pleaded ignorance about basic classification symbols, agents could’ve produced the State documents she signed acknowledging she was briefed about how to ID and handle classified information at the highest levels.

Read at: http://nation.foxnews.com/2016/09/09/how-fbi-went-easy-hillary-clinton


36 posted on 09/09/2016 7:17:48 AM PDT by KeyLargo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-36 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson