Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Texas Judge Shoots Down Injunction to Delay Campus Carry
ammoland ^ | 27 August, 2016 | Dean Weingarten

Posted on 09/08/2016 6:47:27 AM PDT by marktwain

Empty Holster Protest Campus Carry

On 6 June, 2016, Two professors from the University of Texas, Austin and a Distinguished Teaching Associate Professor filled a lawsuit against the state Attorney General, the President of the University of Texas at Austin, and the members of the Board of Regents of the University of Texas at Austin.  The lawsuit makes a number of frivilous claims, including that the law is vague, the law violates the plaintiffs’ First Amendment, Second Amendment, and Fourteenth Amendment rights.  The arguments were childish, irrational, emotional rants.  Here is an example:

48. The Texas statutes and university policies that prohibit Plaintiffs from exercising their individual option to forbid handguns in their classrooms violate the Second Amendment to the United States Constitution, as applied in Texas through the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. These policies and procedures deprive Plaintiffs of their Second Amendment right to defend themselves and others in their classrooms from handgun violence by compelling them as public employees to passively acquiesce in the presence of loaded weaponry in their place of public employment without the individual possession and use of such weaponry in public being well-regulated. This infringement lacks any important justification and is imposed without any substantial link between the objectives of the policies and the means chosen to achieve them.

A right to violate others Second Amendment rights in public places.  That is a novel interpretation of the Second Amendment.  Positively Orwellian.

The lawsuit was first heard on 4 August, 2016.  The Plaintiffs asked for a preliminary injunction to suspend the implementation of the law while the lawsuit proceeded. Preliminary injunctions are seldom granted.  The requirements are fairly rigorous. From the case documents:

(1) a substantial likelihood of success on the merits,

(Excerpt) Read more at ammoland.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Government; News/Current Events; US: Texas
KEYWORDS: banglist; campuscarry; college; conecealcarry; defense; secondamendment; tx; university
A federal judge shoots down a motion for an injunction to stop the implementation of campus carry.
1 posted on 09/08/2016 6:47:27 AM PDT by marktwain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: marktwain

How are these idiot professors even going to know? (Actually, I like this situation. It drives them crazy guessing, which is fine with me.)


2 posted on 09/08/2016 6:57:38 AM PDT by fwdude (If we keep insisting on the lesser of two evils, that is exactly what they will give us from now on.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marktwain

Time for resignations. Now.


3 posted on 09/08/2016 7:07:57 AM PDT by MeneMeneTekelUpharsin (Freedom is the freedom to discipline yourself so others don't have to do it for you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marktwain

without the individual possession and use of such weaponry in public being well-regulated.


They want the students to practice using and maintain their weapons in class?


4 posted on 09/08/2016 7:15:40 AM PDT by lepton ("It is useless to attempt to reason a man out of a thing he was never reasoned into"--Jonathan Swift)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marktwain

It’s been ten days that open carry on ut’s campus was mandated by the law.So far, no Leftist professors have been shot, not that they haven’t deserved it.


5 posted on 09/08/2016 7:19:33 AM PDT by txrefugee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fwdude
How are these idiot professors even going to know?

Ed Zachary! It's CONCEALED!

6 posted on 09/08/2016 7:20:54 AM PDT by Road Warrior ‘04 (Molon Labe! (Oathkeeper))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: marktwain

No preliminary injunction. So does it still move to trial?

An appeal won’t have much chance at the fifth circuit.


7 posted on 09/08/2016 8:41:11 AM PDT by yefragetuwrabrumuy ("Don't compare me to the almighty, compare me to the alternative." -Obama, 09-24-11)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yefragetuwrabrumuy

Not certain yet. I do not think the judge has ruled on motions for declaratory judgement yet.


8 posted on 09/08/2016 5:00:45 PM PDT by marktwain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson