Wow, look at that 2008-2016 photo comparison. A woman of Mrs. Clinton’s financial means could certainly afford to maintain cosmetic appearances. This timeline is only 8 years? Some one might say has to do with all the stress of being Secretary of State, but that was only less than a full 4 years? Yes, I acknowledge she has a stroke ...but what a radical difference in a short period of time.
I don’t actually think her face looks unusually aged for the span from 61 to 69.
But the sequence of photos shows how very important her perky ‘do is for her.
You are on target re how bad she looks in just 8 years.
She is a wealthy woman in the spotlight. We can safely bet that she has spent a small fortune to look younger and healthy.
However, with her debilitating health issues, she looks like and sounds like (with her coughing issues) a very sick old woman.
The average American voters don’t understand nor care about her acts of treason, criminal activities and failures as a SOS. However, they know by looking at her and listening to her coughing, she is a sick old woman. Her rabid rat voters don’t care, but the independents will probably say no at the ballot box.
Also, the 20 to 30 year old voters, who feel that older Americans have $crewed them, will probably not vote for her.
Even if they don’t vote for Trump, she will not get their votes. The rats have depended on the votes from the 20-30 year old voters since the 1960’s.