Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

How Liberal Judges Took Control of 70 Percent of US Appeals Courts
The Daily Signal ^ | September 4, 2016 | Philip Wegmann

Posted on 09/06/2016 9:41:32 AM PDT by fwdude

On the campaign trail in 2008, Barack Obama promised to fundamentally transform the United States of America. After nearly eight years as president, he has delivered on one front by reshaping the federal judiciary.

That revolution has been comprehensive, dramatic, and under the radar.

When Obama entered the Oval Office, liberal judges controlled just one of the 13 circuits of the U.S. Court of Appeals. Fifty-five successful presidential nominations later, liberal majorities now control nine of those appeals benches, or 70 percent.

(Excerpt) Read more at dailysignal.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Government; Miscellaneous; Philosophy
KEYWORDS: appealscourt; appealscourts; judicialactivism; liberaljudges
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-37 next last
This is how it was done, not by legislation, but by judicial edict.

Even Obamacare could have been overturned easily had it not been for the judges that Obama appointed.

1 posted on 09/06/2016 9:41:32 AM PDT by fwdude
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: fwdude

Ugh. Depressing.


2 posted on 09/06/2016 9:45:50 AM PDT by MarMema
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fwdude

Imagine how bad it will get if Hillary is elected.. Yikes.


3 posted on 09/06/2016 9:49:16 AM PDT by Wayne07
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fwdude

Those judges must be removed, promptly.


4 posted on 09/06/2016 9:49:58 AM PDT by dsc (Any attempt to move a government to the left is a crime against humanity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fwdude

Just enough to home them in contempt.


5 posted on 09/06/2016 9:51:39 AM PDT by Biggirl ("One Lord, one faith, one baptism" - Ephesians 4:5)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

Correction: Just enough to hold them in contempt.


6 posted on 09/06/2016 9:53:20 AM PDT by Biggirl ("One Lord, one faith, one baptism" - Ephesians 4:5)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: MrShoop

Very true. Hillary will appoint enough liberal judges to finish us off. If hillary serves for 8 years as president, just based on attrition, retirements of judges, that 70% number could easily top 90% by the end of a new Clinton administration.


7 posted on 09/06/2016 9:57:42 AM PDT by Dilbert San Diego
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: fwdude
These Judges are not liberal but communists.
8 posted on 09/06/2016 10:12:12 AM PDT by Logical me
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Logical me

How many can be fired/impeached?


9 posted on 09/06/2016 10:16:19 AM PDT by DIRTYSECRET (urope. Why do they put up with this.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: DIRTYSECRET
How many can be fired/impeached?

With this spineless GOP? Zero.

10 posted on 09/06/2016 10:22:48 AM PDT by fwdude (If we keep insisting on the lesser of two evils, that is exactly what they will give us from now on.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Logical me
These Judges are not liberal but communists.

I cannot agree more.

11 posted on 09/06/2016 10:23:47 AM PDT by fwdude (If we keep insisting on the lesser of two evils, that is exactly what they will give us from now on.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: fwdude

Yep. And they’re all young and funny indoctrinated. They will be there for a generation.

Legislation is no longer required. Just look around at all aspects of America. It doesn’t matter what the voters say, what the lawmakers legislated, or even if there are no laws. A judge just makes a declaration from the bench and TUH DUH!!! It’s law.


12 posted on 09/06/2016 10:29:28 AM PDT by Organic Panic (Hillary Clinton, the elderly woman's version of "I dindu nuffins.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fwdude

Simple lesson here for the NeverTrump people:

Trump might well reverse this trend. Nothing is guaranteed, of course, but his published list of potential Supreme Court nominees is very promising.

Hillary, OTOH, will DEFINITELY continue this trend. We will lose not only the Supreme Court, but all of the lower level courts (where 95% of the decisions are NOT reviewed by the Supremes). IMHO, Hillary will force out a lot of the conservative/Constitutionalist judges and Justices, with threats and/or bribes, so the Circuits will be 100% liberal-controlled by the end of her first term.

Wake up, people! We cannot allow Hillary to become President - EVER! If Churchill could send military equipment to Stalin in order to fight Hitler, then you can go a LOT less further down a similar road and support Trump (who is not even close to being a Stalin) over Hillary (who ain’t all that far away from Hitler in her ambitions for power).


13 posted on 09/06/2016 10:42:49 AM PDT by Ancesthntr ("The right to buy weapons the right to be free." A. E. van Vogt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fwdude
They will have to use Congress's authority to realign the lower courts to make wholesale changes. Newt Gingrich has written some position papers on this.

A new Judiciary Act of 2017 would need to pass cloture in the Senate, however.

-PJ

14 posted on 09/06/2016 10:47:19 AM PDT by Political Junkie Too (If you are the Posterity of We the People, then you are a Natural Born Citizen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dsc

Unfortunately they all have lifetime appointments. They can be removed by the guilty votes of 67 Senators in an impeachment trial or by their resignation.


15 posted on 09/06/2016 10:52:18 AM PDT by Nero Germanicus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: fwdude

Do judges have any enforcemnet power? Why not just ignore them?


16 posted on 09/06/2016 10:53:20 AM PDT by brianr10 (I'm more equal than everyone.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nero Germanicus
What about a new Judiciary Act that eliminates the court and replaces it with a new one of a different jurisdiction, based on Congress's Article III power to realign the lower courts?

-PJ

17 posted on 09/06/2016 10:56:57 AM PDT by Political Junkie Too (If you are the Posterity of We the People, then you are a Natural Born Citizen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: dsc

Unless they commit impeachable offenses, they a there as long as they want to be.


18 posted on 09/06/2016 11:08:04 AM PDT by Bryan24 (When in doubt, move to the right..........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: brianr10

Its called “Contempt of Court,” federal judges can imprison whoever they feel has disobeyed their order and they can keep someone held in contempt locked up until they agree to comply.
Strangely, civil contempt can be worse than criminal contempt. In criminal contempt you have “innocent until proven guilty” protections, usually a jury trial before a different judge. In civil contempt, the original judge can just order you to be locked up and there is no appeal.
The maximum time for imprisonment for contempt under federal guidelines is eighteen months.


19 posted on 09/06/2016 11:13:54 AM PDT by Nero Germanicus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Political Junkie Too

The Judiciary Act does not amend the Constitution.
Article III, Section 1: “The judicial power of the United States, shall be vested in one Supreme Court, and in such inferior courts as the Congress may from time to time ordain and establish. The judges, both of the supreme and inferior courts, shall hold their offices during good behaviour, and shall, at stated times, receive for their services, a compensation, which shall not be diminished during their continuance in office.”

Since the beginnng of the republic “good behavior” has meant not being convicted of a felony. Attempts to remove judges for their rulings have failed.


20 posted on 09/06/2016 11:20:24 AM PDT by Nero Germanicus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-37 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson