The libs tried this scare tactic with Reagan in 1980. Happens every time they have some weenie in office that has weakened America.
My confirmation bias makes me believe that confirmation bias causes confirmation bias.
“deporting 11 million people”
Again, with 11 mill.
It appears that the “stuff” drip, drip, dripping out of the Clinton Crime Syndicate has finally turned corrosive. FINALLY!!
But it begs a question that DOES NOT augur well for our nation’s future: WHAT THE HELL TOOK SO LONG????
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/3466416/posts
Having nominated a true patriot, we dare not let him down. It is difficult to see how we can stop the deliberate betrayal of America & the Americans by those who hate our heritage, if we do not defeat them now.
America is the issue! And Trump is clearly the candidate on our side. ("Who We Are," As Trump Supporters!)
Damn the Lies! Damn the Liars! Full Speed Ahead!
I highly recommend Scott Adams’ blog to people in here.
His writings go a long ways to explaining Trump’s approach, but more important, they make Trump’s sometimes outrageous statements easier to digest. And by “digest” I mean to understand why he’s making them in the first place.
One example: Trump goes for the black vote and then he says to those who are skeptical that he’ll get any at all that he’ll get 95% of the black vote. Outrageous, yes, but it got their attention. They have to cover it because it sounds like such an idiotic statement, and coming from a supposed right wing presidential candidate to boot.
Then, later on, Trump will get to say well maybe not 95% but at least half. And with his numbers rising due to the initial exposure plus his outreach efforts, pretty soon 50% doesn’t sound outrageous, and then blacks decide maybe there’s something to this guy after all, etc.
As I said at the outset, Adams has done a good job of explaining the reasons for Trump’s bombast. I’ve found that referring to him when I discuss Trump with skeptical voters is an excellent way to get them to reconsider his approach and see it in a more favorable light themselves.
By the way, Adams has stated that he thinks Trump will win in a landslide due mainly to his skills of persuasion.
And they "worry" because that's all they've heard from the fourth estate fifth column, a litany of lies.
Perhaps more people would know what “confirmation bias” is if instead of calling it by a purposefully obfuscating name like that it was called something more straightforward, like “cherry picking facts”
Reminds me of terms like “quantitative easing” or “affirmative action”.
You think "Muslim" is a race, like a guy I talked to yesterday.
Trump doesn’t scare me. But, the Federal Government and the media does. Burn them both to the ground and start over.
This is one of his best “persuasion” columns about Trump. I LOL’d at his example of New York talk vs California talk.
Bookmark.