Posted on 09/03/2016 9:24:40 PM PDT by Mr. Mojo
CNSNews.com) - In a July 2 interview with the Federal Bureau of Investigation about her email practices, use of a personal email server, and specific emails she sent and received as secretary of state, Hillary Clinton told her questioners, as the FBI summarized it, that she “could not recall,” “did not recall,” “did not remember” or "had no recollection” 41 times.
“Clinton did not recall receiving any emails she thought should not be on an unclassified system,” Clinton told the FBI, according to page 4 of the summary that was released today. “She relied on State officials to use their judgment when emailing her and could not recall anyone raising concerns with her regarding the sensitivity of the information she received at her email address.”
That paragraph included the eleventh and twelfth examples of when the FBI said she told them should did not or could not recall something.
“HUMA ABEDIN also had an account on clintonemail.com because she frequently assisted Clinton with personal matters,” said the FBI summary. “CLINTON did not recall any other individual s being offered an account on clintonemail.com.”
In the summary, the FBI describes several instances in which a specific email was presented to Clinton during the bureau’s interview with her and she said she did recall the email.
The FBI’s redacted summary of its exchange with Clinton over one specific email she did not remember makes reference to “deliberation over a future drone strike.”
“[Redacted] After reviewing an email dated [redacted] with subject line [redacted] CLINTON stated she did not remember the email specifically,” said the FBI summary. “CLINTON stated deliberation over a future drone strike did not give her cause for concern regarding classification. CLINTON understood this type of conversation as part of the routine deliberation process. Moreover, she recalled many conversations about future strikes that never occurred.”
In the interview with the FBI, according to the summary, Clinton said that after she had a concussion and a blood clot at the end of 2012, she did not “recall every briefing she received” at the end of her tenure at the State Department.
“CLINTON stated she received no instructions or direction regarding the preservation or production of records from State during the transition out of her role as Secretary of State in early 2013,” said the summary. “However, in December 2012, CLINTON suffered a concussion and then around the New Year a blood clot. “Based on her doctor’s advice, she could only work at State for a few hours a day and could not recall every briefing she received.”
I knew a man that got whacked in the head cutting down a tree on one of his farms back in the 90’s.
For over a year, he thought it was 1974.
WTF is up with that?!
“Well I can’t remember, my mind’s in a blender, it’s Jell-O”.....The Rush Limbaugh show.
Excellent summation.
Heh.
Let’s just hope that Assange cleans the H-beast’s clock soon.
http://www.anonews.co/hillary-assange/
Is it better to unleash it now, or later? (or is Assange just stalling in order to allow for negotiations?)
41 times?
In what? The first 10 minutes?
The voters should punish her...
In today’s column on TownHall, Kevin McCullough refers to this as the “dumb blonde” defense ... which Clinton is overplaying and not too well.
Clinton said “I don’t remember because of my concussion 41 TIMES in the FBI interview.
Concussion 2012,.... 3 hour Interview 2016.
Billy Boy had his staff take a hammer to Hillary’s digital devices, 13 of them ! Then they used Bleach bit?
In forensics wouldn’t they call that a smoking gun?
Furtherore...given that Hillary is auditioning for a ‘memory intensive job’ and can’t recall what she should recall is a HUGE stop sign.... memory sourced problems spoken of in she just can’t recall are NOT going to cut it!
Post concussive syndrome is characterized by impact upon memory.... Retrograde and Anterograde...... Clinton is asserting Anterograde.
yes, the Rose Law Firm files...
I don’t recall all the details of Travelgate - but I do remember going through that time - and like today - it was almost one crime after another being reported. Back then, it didn’t matter....it became “old news” fast....and nothing ever happened because of it all.
Today’s crimes may be more of a “weight” on the clinton crime machine. I hope so.
The White House Travel Office putsch was payment by the Clintons to their campaign travel sponsors.
The same pattern shown by the Clinton Foundation...
OH - I did not know that either. Interesting indeed.
100% you nailed it! Thx for posting that.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.