Posted on 09/02/2016 8:22:47 AM PDT by mbass3
The Commission on Presidential Debates has made its decision on who will be presiding over the 2016 face-offs between Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton.
The debate on September 26 will be moderated by Lester Holt of NBC. Anderson Cooper of CNN and Martha Raddatz of ABC will co-moderate the second debate on October 9. Finally, Fox anchor Chris Wallace will host the third debate on October 19.
(Excerpt) Read more at mediaite.com ...
They should all be standing debates.
Details and info can be seen here:
I don’t watch network tv. Lester Holt, is he the moron?
The moderators were always going to members of the Ministry Of Propaganda.
There was never going to be a “fair” debate.
HELL NO! This is a list of Liberal-Leftist HACKS. JUST SAY NO!
They should all be standing debate
**********
How they been formatted otherwise?
We’ve been thinking Hillary would come up with some excuse to get out of the debates, but this assures she will be there knowing the questions to be asked will be sent from her campaign to the moderators next week.
Chris Wallace is a registered Democrat.
I’m so sick of these people. They should have some black American from the worst of ghetto’s, a factory worker, a stay at home mom, you know, people from all walks of life. I can tell you that would be a fact revealing debate, instead of agenda based talking heads. Sure, individual folks have leanings, but you can bet you would get better questions, more would turn it, and America would wake up. We are a great nation, capable of great things, if all of our citizens would unite, become one people, all Americans, full of love for country and each other we would again be that shining light on a hill. We have gone wrong, and all at fault to some extent. It is not to late. A smoldering wick he will not snuff out.
These will not in any way be debates.
They will be leftist hacks trying to make Clinton look good and Trump look bad.
Watch, she will have banged her toe and will be seated IMO.
Trump does fine with debates and reporters
Watch, she will have banged her toe and will be seated IMO.
*****************
Well that should help Trump.
And a member of the Ministry of Propaganda
that’s exactly what Hillary! wants: no debates.
I don’t *like* the selection of moderators, but The Donald should be able to handle himself, not so sure about Hillary! I’d take my chances.
What happened to the Art of the Deal? Trump lost big time on this deal.
TRUMP IS GOING TO HAVE TO HANDLE HIMSELF WITH MUCH WORSE THAN THIS!
Trust him to rise to the occasion, win the debates, and turn the debates to his favor.
He could do a Dateline segment on the Clinton's on Discovery ID channel. He's used to dealing with criminals and their acts. He should be right at home moderating a debate with Hillary.
Laura Ingram is on Trumps campaign, spoke at the convention.
Theoretically neutrality is needed.
Look at the upside: At least Gwen Awful isn’t in there.
Trump should refuse the second debate. This would demonstrate that A.) He’s in charge B.) Screw CNN and Anderson Cooper. C.) Get rid of all the fake “undecided voters” format, which is likely to be the worst. D.) Let him do something else instead.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.