Not worth much.
I remember reading it at the time and not buying it at all.
It was that vote and cloture for TPA that opened my eyes about Ted Cruz.
The closer I looked without the rose-colored glasses, the less I liked.
He’s a fraud who learned the right phrases and how to act conservative.
It was all about getting him to the White House.
The Constitution says he is not eligible.
The Kenyanesian Usurper got by with it and he wanted to as well.
The resolution for McCain stated his TWO citizen parents was what made him a natural born citizen even though he was born in Panama.
The claim for Obama was he was born here, even though he claimed a Kenyan national as father.
Neither were eligible, nor were Cruz, Jindal, Haley and Rubio.
Both parties wanted to get rid of the natural born citizen requirement.
Natural born citizen means both.
Born here of citizen parents.
The founders wanted no foreign influence.
No foreign birth
No foreign parent(s)
No foreign citizenship(s)
It certainly never meant Cubans born in Canada.
Again, for what it's worth...
Texas Senator and GOP presidential candidate Sen. Ted Cruz (R-TX) argued Trade Promotion Authority (TPA) "is not giving the president more authority" and that Sen. Jeff Sessions (R-AL) is "not accurate" in some of his claims regarding the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) on Friday's broadcast of "The Kuhner Report" on Boston's WRKO.
Cruz argued that he had been the staunchest opponent of President Barack Obama in Congress. He then separated TPA (Trade Promotion Authority) and the TPP (the Trans-Pacific Partnership). He touched on TPA first, stating that "history has demonstrated, the only way to get a trade agreement adopted is with fast-track. Since FDR, consistently, for 80 years, presidents in both parties have had fast-track. Anytime fast-track has lapsed, trade agreements don't get negotiated."
He later added that it was a "misunderstanding" to say TPA gave away the Senate's treaty power. Cruz stated that "Under the Constitution, there are two ways to make binding law. Number one, you can pass a treaty ratified by 2/3rds of the Senate. Or number two, you can pass legislation passed by a majority of both of houses of Congress and signed by the president. ... TPA uses the second constitutional path."
And "it's been long recognized that the Constitution's Origination Clause applies to trade bills, which means the House of Representatives has to be involved. There's a reason why trade bills have historically not been done as treaties, because the Constitution says that anything concerning the raising of revenues, and trade bills concern tariffs, which are the raising of revenues, has to originate in the House of Representatives. So, the process of approving a trade agreement through both houses of Congress has been the way it has been done for roughly a century. And it is not giving the president more authority."
Regarding TPP, Cruz said he was undecided because there was no "actual agreement" regarding TPP.
He later blasted classification of the text of TPP as "idiotic." He continued that claims made by Senator Jeff Sessions were "not accurate"... this trade agreement, now, at least the current draft... does not impact, change, alter, or effect US immigration law. There is a brief section in the TPP that concerns issues of immigration, but explicitly, the United States doesn't join that section."
He further pointed to his amendment to prevent trade agreements from impacting immigration that the House agreed to include. Cruz continued, "Beyond that, the notion of giving up sovereignty and an international body that can alter US law, Jeff, I have spent 20 years fighting to defend United States sovereignty. There is no one in the Senate who has been a stronger opponent of international bodies taking away our authority. ... And it is simply false that the TPP trade agreement gives up our sovereignty. There is nothing in TPA or TPP that can give a foreign body the ability to make binding law in the United States of America under our Constitution." Although, he stated that it was natural and understandable people would be suspicious of a secret agreement.
He added that "if this president tried to slip something in, it would have to be approved by Congress, and by the way, under the terms of fast-track, TPA, any trade agreement, including the TPP, must be public at least 60 days, the text of it, before it's voted on."
Later, Cruz conceded that while he hasn't "studied" TPP "the way one would for weeks and weeks on end, the way one would during the 60 days when it is public. In a six, seven-hundred page agreement can there be things buried in a footnote that one doesn't see? Sure," Sessions' claims that TPP would undermine US law are "not accurate."
He concluded that the Obama administration would like people to blame job losses on free trade, but that free trade is not to blame for job losses.
(h/t The Right Scoop)
http://www.breitbart.com/video/2015/06/12/cruz-tpa-doesnt-give-obama-more-power-sessions-on-not-accurate-on-tpp/
______________________________________
GOP presidential candidate Sen. Ted Cruz (R-TX) said that he would vote against the Trans Pacific Partnership (TPP) trade deal between the United States and 11 other countries on Friday while campaigning in Iowa.
According to the Des Moines Register, Cruz said he is "deeply concerned" with the trade pact.
"While Cruz said he supports free trade, he believes the Trans Pacific Partnership would undermine U.S. immigration laws and the nation's sovereignty," reported the Des Moines Register.
"There are a number of Republicans on that (debate) stage who support TPP, who support (the Trade Promotion Authority)," Cruz stated. "I voted against TPA and I intend to vote against TPP." ..."
http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2015/11/21/ted-cruz-vows-vote-tpp-trade-deal-iowa/
Cruz also gets the big picture on Putin and Russia.