[Eleutheria5]

So if you fire indiscriminately into a crowd, you can't be sued in the US. If you shoot a terrorist who might have a bomb strapped to him, you face murder charges. But if he's on life support and you cut it off, you're being humane. Interesting world we live in.

[DannyTN]

“You’re not going crazy, you’re going sane in a crazy world.” - The Tick

[major-pelham]

Every govt in the world that goes to the UN has sufficient nexus to the United States - the court is a fifth column.

[DoughtyOne]

So another words, if I speed my car up to 80 MPH and drive into a crowd, nobody can seek civil damages? He, I wasn’t specifically trying to hit any one person. It was just accidental...

These judges do realize what a bunch of ass hats they’re going to look like right?

[SaveFerris]

[ The victims who brought the lawsuit were U.S. citizens, but the judges said that during the Israel attacks, the shooters “fired indiscriminately” at large groups of people, meaning they weren’t expressly targeting Americans. ]

And, of course, the judges can read the minds of the PLO terrorists. As if that made any difference.

Good gosh.

[Lurking Libertarian]

So if you fire indiscriminately into a crowd, you can't be sued in the US.

If you fire indiscriminately into a crowd in the U.S., you can be sued in the U.S. If you fire indiscriminately into a crowd in Israel, you can be sued in Israel. This is basic personal-jurisdiction law, as much as we'd like to make an exception for the PLO.