Posted on 08/31/2016 1:15:48 PM PDT by UMCRevMom@aol.com
The hacker Guccifer 2.0 was apparently able to get into Rep. Nancy Pelosi's computer, and he found the smoking gun we've all been looking for that implicates the entire Democrat Party in the Benghazi cover-up scandal.
If you remember, the Democrats, led by Susan Rice, made the rounds in the weeks following the attack telling the nation that it was a spontaneous reaction to an Internet video. That narrative has since been debunked, and not a single person has been held accountable for it, but a newly released document shows that everyone within the party knew that they were intentionally spreading lies.
The Gateway Pundit reported that the internal party memo admitted that Ambassador Susan Rice lied about the attacks in the days after 9/11/2012, just a couple months before the upcoming election. The shocking memo also included the bombshell that State reduced security at the annex and it was "a move that was approved at a 'high level.'"
Check out the actual document, via Jim Hoft's Scribd account:
Isn't that something? These people knew they were lying to the American people yet they didn’t care.
In fact, not only did they show no regard for the truth, they created talking points that were lies in order to cover up for the lies they had already told. This isn't only criminal, but it's blatant propaganda distributed by the Democrats so that they all had the same talking points to make their story more believable.
Everyone should be outraged by this, and it should end Hillary Clinton's campaign, if we were to have an honest media. After all, she claims she didn't lie to the families of the victims, yet a document from her own party shows they were all in lock-step on their talking points – the same talking points Hillary used for the families of those who died.
Of course, nothing will be done and the Democrats will once again not be held accountable for their blatant lies and deceit. The only chance we actually have at stopping this garbage is to vote for Trump in November, and we had best pray there's enough of us upset to actually get him into office.
Otherwise what we've seen is going to be child's play compared to what's to come. 
“The entire Democratic Party? Even the mayor of my little town?”
And my liberal Dem co-worker?
Especially your mayor.
Just kidding.
But why was security intentionally reduced?
Because of the belief that an attack was imminent and that would uncover all the weapons there being sold to ISIS per Wilileaks?
Despite the fact that Stevens begged for help?
This was covered up and an innocent man was blamed for the attack and Hillary knew this.
Who is the real war monger, Hillary or the Republicans?
Who is a callous, murderous liar?
I think we know.
Benghazi ping.
Let Republicanprofessor know if you want on or off this ping list.
That’ll work for a very small file, but multiple pages would soon be a pain!
|
Are you still killing your unborn? -- GOD |
Didn't you people learn ANYTHING from the smoke of SODOM?
-- GOD
seconded
bttt
Most of government is RAT.
The famous New Mexican sheperd and mohair subsidy recipient?
Nixon was concerned about the harm that would be done if he did not resign. He cared about America. The RATs don't care about anything but their political power, harm or no harm.
A hairpiece that bad is hard to forget!
wish we could see the date of this item...
looks to be long after the attack...
What does this document prove? I read it and don’t see any smoking gun? Who wrote this document?
I’ve said over and over that Benghazi-Gate is the most hottest potato for DNC and also for some GOP RINOs. It would sink the DNC for good many decades to come if the real truth surfaced. Therefore it’s guarded more than Fort Knox!!!
WHY were there 3+ dozen secret CIA operators in Benghazi, hello???
Yes .. why ..??
I remember a conversation Obama was supposed to have with Hillary and some other person (can’t remember) .. telling them to “handle it”.
The implication was that Obama had other plans and couldn’t be bothered to be concerned about our military ..???
Obama knew Hillary wouldn’t do anything .. and that’s exactly what he wanted.
Besides that .. all three of these people were willing to diddle while Benghazi burned .. and it was mostly their own people who were being killed. Pretty cold and calculating if you ask me.
This was and is Obama’s total modus operandi
He would stay as hands-off as possible while letting other people do the work. Then he could blame them if it went bad, and take credit when i went good.
Like killing bin laden- he cancelled 3 different requests that came directly to him, until Leon Panetta asked (probably in frustration) under what circumstances would they be able to go ahead.
Then Leon made sure those curcumstances were met and just assumed they had the go-ahead, let them begin the operation, an only called in Obama off the golf course to watch after it was too late to stop them.
I even heard one story that Panetta told Odumbass that if he DID stop it, then Panetta would go public and say so. (but that is just a rumor)
Then Oshitforbrains pranced all around proudly proclaiming “When I GAVE THE ORDER,” [which he didn’t] “...They were ready”
I knew the instant I heard the video story that it was bogus. How could you not? It was so obvious.
The fact that they lie about something so obvious from the get go shows the utter contempt they have for citizens.
In fact they do not consider us citizens, but rather subjects.
Thanks for the ping.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.