To: Semper911
Better question: Why didn’t they form their own charities?
It charity was genuinely what they wanted.
6 posted on
08/25/2016 8:47:29 AM PDT by
BenLurkin
(The above is not a statement of fact. It is either satire or opinion. Or both.)
To: BenLurkin
Why didn’t they form their own charities?The article discusses that. Why the Clinton Foundation and not other charities that do similar work? The answer is obvious.
16 posted on
08/25/2016 9:07:01 AM PDT by
Semper911
(When you want to rob Peter to pay Paul, you'll always have the support of Paul.)
To: BenLurkin
One of the Five Pillars of Islam, Charity, seems to be the least ‘popular’ one.................
19 posted on
08/25/2016 9:12:32 AM PDT by
Red Badger
(Make America AMERICA again!.........................)
To: BenLurkin
Better question: Why didn’t they form their own charities?
It charity was genuinely what they wanted.
...
I thought they already had their own AIDS charity, pushing homos off tall buildings.
45 posted on
08/26/2016 4:01:19 AM PDT by
Moonman62
(Make America Great Again!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson