Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Vigilanteman

The only defense you have against fraud in bigger cities is to hold off results until they have posted results. The fraudsters like to know how many votes need to be manufactured.


6 posted on 08/24/2016 2:00:33 PM PDT by entropy12 (Majority of Politicians are either Globalists pushing cheap labor express or are Neocons.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: entropy12
I really wish we could do that. But as a the judge of a precinct election board, I can tell you why it doesn't happen.

We are at the polling place at 6 am to get things set up and ready to go by 7 am. We have to let anybody vote who is in lime by 8 pm. By the time the votes are counted, the machines are read and the the absentee votes are read in and tabulated, it can be 9 pm or even later in a heavy turnout election. Then, the judge (that's me in our precinct) drives the results and other materials into the courthouse where we may be another 30 minutes or so waiting in various lines to turn them in. I'm lucky to be home by 10:30 or 11 pm. Meanwhile, some precincts in Philly are still rotating people and taking votes, something those of us in the honest counties are not allowed to do.

The real solution would be to adopt an electoral vote award system as they have in Maine and Nebraska-- two for the statewide winner, one for the winner of each congressional district. That alone would considerably lower the potential reward for fraud-- 3-4 electoral votes, not 20.

8 posted on 08/24/2016 2:09:58 PM PDT by Vigilanteman (ObaMao: Fake America, Fake Messiah, Fake Black man. How many fakes can you fit into one Zer0?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson