And she has the audacity to ask for your vote.
It's revolting.
Clinton's campaign is a monstrous insult and an abomination.
Posted on 08/24/2016 6:45:40 AM PDT by C19fan
An Islamic journal where Huma Abedin, Hillary Clinton's top aide, was assistant editor published an article accusing Jews of 'working the American political system' – and being aided by the 'memory of the Holocaust'. Abedin, who is vice-chair of Clinton's 2016 presidential campaign, spent 12 years as an assistant editor for Journal of Minority Muslim Affairs. Her mother, Saleha Mahmood Abedin, is the journal's editor-in-chief and has been accused of espousing the views of the Muslim Brotherhood through the publication. Huma Abedin's brother, Hassan, is an associate editor and her sister, Heba, is an assistant editor.
(Excerpt) Read more at dailymail.co.uk ...
Sure looks that way.
‘What on earth are you blathering about? What “Jewish orthodoxy”?’
My interpretation of ‘orthodoxy’ is a monopoly of a religion. The Jewish religious leaders weilded secular power in Amsterdam that punished those who questioned their rigid demands.
You have made an accusation. Now back it up with FACTS.
While Huma Abedin was Assistant Editor of the “Journal of Muslim Minority Affairs”, Abdullah O Naseef - founder of Rabita Trust, a designated terrorist organization & Al Qaeda funder - was a member of the Advisory Editorial Board. When Naseef was sued by 9/11 victims’ relatives his name was removed from the masthead.
Huma’s brother Hasan is also an editor at the Journal, and he is also a Fellow at the Oxford Center for Islamic Studies - where Naseef is a Trustee.
Clinton was US Senator from New York when Al Qaeda attacked on Sep 11, 2001, Human Abedin was by her side then. Huma Abedin remains by her side.
It seems Hillary Clinton is unfazed by her friend’s association with backers of the September 11th attacks.
Clinton’s campaign for the Presidency is an atrocity!
I think this whole stunt is going to blowback right in Hillary's elitist face.
Vote Trump!
And she has the audacity to ask for your vote.
It's revolting.
Clinton's campaign is a monstrous insult and an abomination.
You want ‘facts’ and I can offer historic research.
Here is an admittedly weak example, but I could remember his name.
Baruch Spinoza
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Baruch_Spinoza
The leftists love that guy so much that he has a statue in Amsterdam.
‘Spinoza’s break with the prevailing dogmas of Judaism, and particularly the insistence on non-Mosaic authorship of the Pentateuch, was not sudden; rather, it appears to have been the result of a lengthy internal struggle ...’
[snip]
‘Nevertheless, once branded as a heretic, Spinoza’s clashes with authorities became more pronounced. For example, questioned by two members of his synagogue, Spinoza apparently responded that God has a body and nothing in scripture says otherwise.[39] He was later attacked on the steps of the synagogue by a knife-wielding assailant shouting “Heretic!” He was apparently quite shaken by this attack and for years kept (and wore) his torn cloak, unmended, as a souvenir.
[snip]
The Talmud Torah congregation issued censure routinely, on matters great and small, so such an edict was not unusual.[
[snip]
[He felt safer in Germany — a lot of small states there. And some of them offered refuge to free thinkers] where he became a controversial philosopher. But he eventually returned to Amsterdam.]
[quote]
When the public reactions to the anonymously published Theologico-Political Treatise were extremely unfavourable to his brand of Cartesianism, Spinoza was compelled to abstain from publishing more of his works.
[snip]
[So even Germans had trouble with him.]
[quote]
Spinoza argued that God exists and is abstract and impersonal.[3] Spinoza’s view of God is what Charles Hartshorne describes as Classical Pantheism.[90] Spinoza has also been described as an “Epicurean materialist,”[83] specifically in reference to his opposition to Cartesian mind-body dualism. This view was held by Epicureans before him, as they believed that atoms with their probabilistic paths were the only substance that existed fundamentally.[91][92] Spinoza, however, deviated significantly from Epicureans by adhering to strict determinism, much like the Stoics before him, in contrast to the Epicurean belief in the probabilistic path of atoms, which is more in line with contemporary thought on quantum mechanics.[93][94] Spinoza’s system imparted order and unity to the tradition of radical thought, offering powerful weapons for prevailing against “received authority.” He contended that everything that exists in Nature (i.e., everything in the Universe) is one Reality (substance) and there is only one set of rules governing the whole of the reality which surrounds us and of which we are part. Spinoza viewed God and Nature as two names for the same reality,[83] namely a single, fundamental substance (meaning “that which stands beneath” rather than “matter”) that is the basis of the universe and of which all lesser “entities” are actually modes or modifications, that all things are determined by Nature to exist and cause effects, and that the complex chain of cause and effect is understood only in part. His identification of God with nature was more fully explained in his posthumously published Ethics.
[snip]
[To be honest, the philosphical terms are ‘Greek’ to me.]
BTW — Soros is the son of an atheist Jew. His father was a kook. Quite an interesting fellow. And Soros became a Nazi collaborator who said on air that the holocaust was the best years of his life.
I offered a lengthy example of a Jewish heretic above. His persecution had whipped up violence against him. But that was a mild weilding of secular power compared to others.
Here is a good start to understand the break between Jewish Heretics and the Jewish leadership:
Heresy in Judaism
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heresy_in_Judaism
Years ago I had verified this overall concept in other websites. So it’s not B.S.
The Jewish leadership weilded secular power. That is why I call it an orthodoxy. They could end the life of heretics, they could get them exiled. They could have them beaten. And they sometimes did.
It was not as oppressive as the Inquisitions, but the Jewish religious leaders were in many ways much like the Pharisees who Jesus confronted.
Jim, can you please tell everyone (or at least P.M. me) why Sargon’s account was banned/suspended.
I am not his/her friend or relative, I’ve never (to my knowledge) even had an exchange on FR with him/her, and I’m not going to bat for him/her, but I didn’t see anything in his/her comments that appeared to be grounds for this. I am just curious.
Thanks very much for all that you do.
sargon is not banned or suspended.
Jim,
Thanks for your reply. However, when I click on Sargon’s name, this is what comes up:
sargon
Since Aug 27, 1998
view home page, enter name:
View
~ About ~ Links ~ Contact ~ In Forum ~ Mail To ~
Return
This account has been banned or suspended.
I didn’t know Huma was a Birchite.
I saw another FReeper do it once, and I imitated them. Laz, I think it was.
I can proudly say that I've never even been put on a timeout since the day I registered. Although I've probably pushed the envelope once or twice, what with occasionally calling for the armed overthrow of the government and all...
Vote Trump!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.