Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Obama to Israel: Our Tax Dollars Won’t Go to Your Defense Contractors
Yahoo news ^ | Aug. 20, 2016 | Dan De Luce and Paul McLeary,

Posted on 08/20/2016 2:33:10 PM PDT by Tours

The United States and Israel are close to clinching a massive 10-year arms deal, but Washington is pushing to scrap a coveted provision that has allowed Israel to pump hundreds of millions of dollars directly into its defense industry.

If successful, the administration’s push to remove the clause would inflict some real pain on Israel’s growing security sector, which already exports more arms overseas than almost any other country apart from the United States. On the flip side, the change would mean a potential windfall for American defense contractors scrambling to sell their wares abroad to make up for declining sales at home. The Middle East and Asia are now driving growth for major U.S. contractors, with about a quarter of revenue coming from international sales, compared with 15 percent in 2008.

The proposed shift “could be very good news for the U.S. defense industry,” said Loren Thompson, a longtime consultant for American military contractors, because “domestic defense spending is flat as a pancake and Israel is a consumer of high-end military technology.”

The issue has been a sticking point in the talks over the new military aid package because it could deprive Israel’s security firms of roughly $10 billion over the next decade, a vast sum for a crucial sector of the country’s economy. The deal, which doesn’t involve the direct transfer of military hardware but instead a commitment from Washington to finance Israel’s weapons buying, illustrates how the two countries’ security ties remain strong enough to transcend the tensions that have plagued relations between U.S. President Barack Obama and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.

Under the change proposed by the White House, Israel would have to spend all the funds it receives in the arms package on U.S.-made weapons instead of being allowed to spend a portion of it on Israeli-manufactured arms and fuel. That would mean American aerospace giants such as Lockheed Martin, which builds the F-35 fighter jet, and Raytheon, which sells precision-guided missiles and sensors to U.S. partners worldwide, would stand to benefit.

The rationale for setting aside a chunk of U.S. money for Israeli-made arms dates back to the 1980s, when the country was trying to build up its own defense sector. But, since then, Israel’s security firms have flourished and in some cases now compete with U.S. defense contractors in global markets, selling $5.7 billion worth of weaponry in 2015, with sophisticated radars, electronic systems, drones, and missiles topping the list of high-end exports. That was almost double the $3 billion worth of equipment it exported in 2003.

Helped by the investments Washington has made in the Israeli defense industry over the decades, Israel has emerged by far as the world’s largest exporter of drones, biting into the U.S. export market with over half of all sales going to Europe while also pushing to grow its presence in Asia. Japan and Israel are currently in talks to co-develop new armed and unarmed drones.

“We believe these arrangements, which are unique to Israel, no longer serve U.S. or Israeli interests,” a senior administration official told Foreign Policy. Since the provision was introduced three decades ago, “Israel’s economy has grown dramatically, and Israel is one of the top 10 arms exporters in the world, so the objective has been achieved.”

The rule has meant U.S. companies have lost out on billions of dollars in potential revenue, the official added.

But Israel argues it faces a dizzying range of threats amid upheaval in the Middle East and that it needs to retain the flexibility to address these threats. The Israelis also maintain that their tech-savvy defense firms have cooperated closely with American contractors over the years and that the U.S. military has benefited from Israel’s innovations, including in its drone programs, cyberwarfare, and parts tailored for Apache helicopters.

The current arms package, which was signed in 2007 and will expire in 2018, provided Israel a total of $30 billion to spend on weapons and supplies over a 10-year period. That arrangement allowed for 26.3 percent of the funding to be spent on Israeli-made defense products and fuel, a provision that no other U.S. ally in the world enjoys.

Although the White House is pushing Israel to buy American, the bitter pill is offset slightly by its offering of a pot of guaranteed money for critical missile defense programs over the next decade. Traditionally, funding for programs like the Iron Dome — which has knocked down hundreds of Hezbollah rockets in recent years — has had to come from the U.S. Congress on a year-by-year basis. That proposal has received a mixed reception in Israel as well, however, because it comes with the caveat that Israeli officials would have to refrain from lobbying U.S. lawmakers for additional missile defense batteries in return for the 10-year guaranteed funding.

Analysts in Washington say the Israeli defense industry has grown by leaps and bounds since the last deal was signed in 2007 and has become one of the world’s most influential arms exporters.

Some Israeli defense companies have become players in the U.S. market as well. Elbit Systems has opened several offices in the United States in recent years and now supplies parts, to the tune of tens of millions of dollars, for advanced U.S. weapons like Apache helicopters, F-16s, and Osprey tiltrotor aircraft. In 2014, Elbit even scored a bit of a coup, beating out several U.S. defense giants for the $145 million contract to install sensor towers along the U.S.-Mexico border.

Despite misgivings on the Israeli side about the U.S. proposal, the negotiations on the new memorandum of understanding (MOU) on military aid have gained traction in recent months after nearly faltering more than once. The deep rift between Obama and Netanyahu, which came to a head over the Iran nuclear accord negotiated last year, raised doubts as to whether they could agree on any arms package while Obama was in office.

But once it became clear Republicans in Congress could not muster enough support to block the nuclear deal with Iran, U.S. and Israeli officials resumed negotiations last December.

The United States is offering Israel $3.5 billion to $3.7 billion a year in military assistance over a decade, a major increase from current levels but less than the $4 billion a year initially proposed by Netanyahu’s government.

Israel currently receives more than 50 percent of all U.S. foreign military assistance, and under the proposed deal, Israel’s share of that funding would expand further. The MOU that Washington has put on the table would represent the largest single pledge of military assistance to any country in American history, administration officials said.

There have been four rounds of talks on the MOU, and officials and experts say that after frustratingly slow progress this year, the negotiations have gained momentum and there is cautious optimism that a final agreement can be reached before Obama leaves office in January.

“We’ve made progress and closed many of the remaining gaps. We soon hope to be able to reach a final agreement,” the administration official told FP.

The political climate 10 years ago during the formation of the last aid package — before Obama entered the White House — was dramatically different. “Ten years ago, the White House was advertising its closeness to Israel, and now the White House has to remind people of its closeness to Israel,” said Jon Alterman of the Center for Strategic and International Studies. He said despite political differences, the amount of collaboration between the two countries on counterterrorism and intelligence programs is higher than at any time in history.

Despite the strain between Obama and Netanyahu, postponing a deal until the next U.S. president would mean renegotiating many issues with no result before the spring of next year, at the earliest. Given the need for Israel to continue to upgrade its arsenal and to make long-term strategic plans, Netanyahu “can’t afford not to have a deal,” Alterman said.

Former U.S. officials, congressional staffers, and experts said it was unlikely the deal would require an immediate end to U.S. funds set aside for Israeli-made arms. Instead, the provision likely will be phased out over a period of years to allow the Israeli defense sector to make a smooth transition.

“They’ll meet somewhere in the middle,” said Ilan Goldenberg, a former senior official at the State and Defense departments.

“I would expect that whatever reduction there is, it will be graduated, giving the Israeli defense industry time to adjust,” said Goldenberg, who is now a senior fellow at the Center for a New American Security.

But whatever the timeline, there will be a concrete effect felt in Israel, according to Jonathan Schanzer, the vice president for research at the Foundation for Defense of Democracies. “I think Israel will take a hit economically, and the defense industry will take a hit,” he said. “That’s a significant sum of money for a country the size of Israel.”

For U.S. defense firms selling high-end, sophisticated weapons, any expansion of the Israeli market represents a lucrative opportunity, as the American companies can no longer count on major increases in the Pentagon’s budget, which has leveled off in recent years.

Joel Johnson, an analyst with the Teal Group Corp., said even if the subsidies are phased out, Israel would seek to offset the effect by asking American companies to buy some Israeli-made products for the weapons systems being provided.

“Israelis will probably find a way to get a good deal of that back from the U.S. firms,” Johnson said.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: israel; obama
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-31 next last

1 posted on 08/20/2016 2:33:10 PM PDT by Tours
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Tours

“The United States is offering Israel $3.5 billion to $3.7 billion a year in military assistance over a decade, a major increase from current levels....”

Obama is making major increases in aid to Israel??? Wow!


2 posted on 08/20/2016 2:35:31 PM PDT by Tours
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tours

anything O can do to weaken our allies, he will do

always has, always will

(but Jerusalem knows it has a friend in America, once O can be deported back to his Krapistan...)


3 posted on 08/20/2016 2:36:22 PM PDT by faithhopecharity ("Politicians are not born. They're excreted." Marcus Tullius Cicero)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: faithhopecharity

Note that he is substantially increasing the money...


4 posted on 08/20/2016 2:37:09 PM PDT by Tours
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Tours

Trump voters to Obama: STFU.


5 posted on 08/20/2016 2:39:52 PM PDT by RoosterRedux
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tours

Obama: Exporting Jobs from Israel.


6 posted on 08/20/2016 2:42:13 PM PDT by Timpanagos1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tours

yes but none of these little details will matter one whit
once his Iranian IslamoNazi comrade pals finish deploying their Nuclear Bomb ICBM’s (all of their announced targets are cities in USA, incidentally....)

THAT’s his real agenda, destroy America. Israel, Europe, UK are all on his list, yes indeed. But USA is his Numero Uno for annhilation


7 posted on 08/20/2016 2:42:21 PM PDT by faithhopecharity ("Politicians are not born. They're excreted." Marcus Tullius Cicero)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: RoosterRedux

Actually I find this article to be fascinating. For once, Obama is stressing made in the U.S.A. - in regards to our defense industry.
The last I heard, one of Trump’s main platform points is to return manufacturing back to the U.S.


8 posted on 08/20/2016 2:43:25 PM PDT by Tours
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: faithhopecharity

I tend to believe Obama is more sympathetic to the Saudi/Wahabbi branch of Islam.


9 posted on 08/20/2016 2:44:32 PM PDT by Tours
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Tours
Obama to Israel: I will do everything in my power to help blow you off the face of the earth Our Tax Dollars Won’t Go to Your Defense Contractors .........................fixed it. Our tax dollars? Pfft.
10 posted on 08/20/2016 2:49:42 PM PDT by ColdOne (poochie... Tasha 2000~3/14/11~TrumpÂ’s got this, Barry. Go back to your golf game.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tours
"For once, Obama is stressing made in the U.S.A."
don't be fooled. He and his administration are the devil's mouthpiece. ALWAYS. Screw him and anyone stupid enough to support anything but trial for treason, regarding Obama, Clintong and their supporters. There will be NO healing after this election.
11 posted on 08/20/2016 2:50:25 PM PDT by MIA_eccl1212 (10 rounds 10 meters 10 seconds 10 centimetres)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Tours

Intertesting thought....
yes .... he has shown Tremendous support for both his Iranian Sh’ia(t) IslamoNazi comrades AND the Wha-habist extremists (Sunnis) of Arabia/Moslem Brotherhood mass-murder gangesters in Egypt (also Sunnis), “PA”/PLO murder gangsters in Isarel, etc. etc. etc.

he always seems to find the absolutely worst, most murderous and dangerous Moslem gangs to support.... whether Sh’ia OR Sunni (His apparent indifference as between Sh’ia and Sunni has always been a minor point of mystery for me....but he IS consistent about finding, or creating sometimes... and then supporting, arming, financing, training, and protecting....the very very most rabid, anti=American, anti=Christian, Moslem murder gangs...no matter whether Shia or Sunni.

while undermining our own defenses and those of our allies, of course


12 posted on 08/20/2016 2:50:46 PM PDT by faithhopecharity ("Politicians are not born. They're excreted." Marcus Tullius Cicero)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: faithhopecharity

Note that he is in league with virtually every Western European leader in flooding the West with Muslims. A red carpet welcome.


13 posted on 08/20/2016 2:56:19 PM PDT by Tours
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Tours

this is a bad deal for Israel. American money comes with more than strings, it comes with hamstrings. It is long past time for Israel to cut the ties that bind.

If I were Israel, I’d be looking for a firm defense alliance with India, South Korea, Taiwan and Japan. Together they can form a joint development group and market for each other’s tech. Israel has the most advanced drones on the planet. They are also the largest manufacturer of drones. That market alone could earn them back more than the lost income from Uncle Sugar.

I was directly involved on both sides of manufacturing for foreign military sales and as a former employee of Israel’s, at the time, largest defense contractor. They took US stuff and improved it.


14 posted on 08/20/2016 2:57:32 PM PDT by Gen.Blather (`)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tours

dont mess with your friends..let Israel grow at will.


15 posted on 08/20/2016 3:09:05 PM PDT by aces ( Islam is the religion of the dead, Got Jesus?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tours

Because we have no more tax dollars after sending them all to Iran.


16 posted on 08/20/2016 3:12:11 PM PDT by bgill (From the CDC site, "We don't know how people are infected with Ebola")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tours

yes, several European countries are being SOLD OUT (to the IslamoNazi enemy invasion) by their ruling elites ... and in USA, well ... we have the camel hisself in our Big Tent

prepare for self (and family, and community) defense


17 posted on 08/20/2016 3:25:04 PM PDT by faithhopecharity ("Politicians are not born. They're excreted." Marcus Tullius Cicero)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Tours; All
Thank you for referencing that article Tours. Please note that the following critique is directed at Congress and not at you.

Patriots, although I support the idea of Congress supporting Israel in principle, note that Justice Joseph Story had indicated that the Founding States never expressly constitutionally delegated to the feds the specific power to provide foreign aid to anybody.

“If the tax be not proposed for the common defence, or general welfare, but for other objects, wholly extraneous, (as for instance, for propagating Mahometanism among the Turks, or giving aids and subsidies to a foreign nation, to build palaces for its kings, or erect monuments to its heroes,) it would be wholly indefensible upon constitutional principles [emphases added].” — Justice Joseph Story, Commentaries on the Constitution 2 (1833) .

Next, regardless that the referenced article is vilifying Obama with respect to Israel, note that the Founding States gave the federal “power of the purse” uniquely to the House of Representatives as evidenced by the Constitution’s Clause 1 of Section 7 of Article I. So even if the states had expressly constitutional delegated to the feds the specific power to support foreign nations like Israel, it remains that the decision to support or not support Israel is ultimately up to Congress imo, not the POTUS.

In other words, last-term, lawless Obama is arguably allowing corrupt Congress to use him as its “useful idiot” by doing Congress’s dirty work for it. And by letting Obama do its dirty work concerning Israel for it, corrupt lawmakers are able to keep their voting records clean so that they can fool low-information patriots into reelecting them imo.

Remember in November !

Patriots need to support Trump / Pence by also electing a new, state sovereignty-respecting Congress that will not only work within its constitutional Article I, Section 8-limited powers to support Trump’s vision for making America great again for everybody, but will either put a stop to unconstitutional federal spending, or petition the states for the constitutional authority to justify such spending.

Note that such a Congress will also probably be willing to fire state sovereignty-ignoring activist justices.

18 posted on 08/20/2016 3:26:29 PM PDT by Amendment10
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tours

THE BOTTOM LINE . . .YOU DON’T MESS WITH ISRAEL. . .GOD’S CHOSEN NATION/PEOPLE. WOE TO OUR NATION FOR ANY ILL-ADVISED DECISIONS REGARDING ISRAEL. AMERICA WILL ULTIMATELY SUFFER THE CONSEQUENCES.


19 posted on 08/20/2016 3:27:39 PM PDT by Maudeen (Sinner Saved by Grace)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tours

Hey Barry, guess who that person is standing way off in the background?


20 posted on 08/20/2016 3:40:03 PM PDT by SkyDancer ("They Say That Nobody's Perfect But Yet Here I Am")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-31 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson