Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Oatka

I would have no problem with states doing this collectively with no Federal involvement, but that is never going to happen anytime soon. Insurance is very expensive in some states, and in those states that is often a GOOD thing because the insurance companies must meet very stringent legal requirements that help ensure that they are solvent even if many claims are filed. New York is a good example of this. There’s no way the insurance commission in New York would ever reduce their regulatory requirements just to make sure NY-based companies could compete in a place like Mississippi.


16 posted on 08/22/2016 7:58:58 PM PDT by Alberta's Child ("Sometimes I feel like I've been tied to the whipping post.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]


To: Alberta's Child
There’s no way the insurance commission in New York would ever reduce their regulatory requirements just to make sure NY-based companies could compete in a place like Mississippi.

Point taken, but I was wondering about other states that are not so strict. It would seem to me to be a free-for-all, with companies competing in states like Mississippi, while ignoring NY state. At some point something would have to give - like those NY-based companies going to another state.

17 posted on 08/23/2016 8:25:47 AM PDT by Oatka (Beware of an old man in a profession where men usually die young.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson