So although I’m a stranger on the internet, you have to admit that the author of the Daily Mail article is also a stranger on the internet.
Of the two of us, you choose to believe the news media (that has consistently show an obvious and intentional bias against all things conservative) rather than a fellow freeper?
Interesting how you value the weight of evidence here. By the same level of paranoia that you exhibit, I could assume you are a liberal plant on Free Republic designed to exacerbate the circular firing squad.
See how ridiculous that sounds?
Look....I know you think you know them. You go to church with them......okay, I get that. But to take that loyal friendship and throw all objectivity away in the face of a plethora of pictures and narratives just doesn’t make sense to me. We differ. We differ greatly, apparently and I’m gonna just let this drop and move on and you can push against a mountain of questions all you like.
If it were me, I’d be examining my friendship or acquaintance more carefully. Just because you think you know someone in church doesn’t mean they’re squeaky clean. You won’t even consider the possibility that the kid was stupid and not thinking about what was happening in her interaction with this person.
In weighing evidence wouldn't the statements of the kid and his dad as reported in the press be stronger than your statements regarding them? Unless of course the SF Gate article misquoted them.
That's why you should endeavor to find out what they are really up to. Unless the SF Gate article made up the quotes, then Mr. Anantha and his son are not at all as you believe them to be.
You have given no evidence
What you have said is you know the dad.
Then ask dad some questions!
Where does Jake go to school ? What is his major? What ethnicity is jakes mother?