This article is not an absolute statement of fact, but the result of analysis and opinions by various officials.
1 posted on
08/19/2016 5:37:34 PM PDT by
Truth29
To: Truth29
My response on the moving to Romania thread was that it didn’t seem to make sense, that if we were moving them, moving them to a big, long term base like Aviano would make sense.
2 posted on
08/19/2016 5:39:32 PM PDT by
FreedomPoster
(Islam delenda est)
To: Truth29
The Russian press got it wrong? How could that happen? LOL
3 posted on
08/19/2016 5:41:31 PM PDT by
1rudeboy
To: Truth29
Council on Foreign Relation publication?
To: Truth29
Kind of wonder about the Turkish response to removing our stuff.
10 posted on
08/19/2016 6:00:51 PM PDT by
A CA Guy
(God Bless America, God Bless and keep safe our fighting men and women.)
To: Truth29
Some way, some how, this is all orchestrated to get those nukes into Islamic hands.
To: Truth29
The article is factually inaccurate.
Words mean things.
The responsible officials ‘dismissed’ the charges, they did not ‘deny’ them.
Aside from the diplomatic charlatans, the facts of the massive, and recorded C-17 flights from Deveselu stand unrefuted.
Don't listen to what the diplomats say, rather watch what is done.
TWB
To: Truth29
The only “moving of resources” I’ve seen on TV is about our heavy bombers being moved to Guam .. because of the issues with China’s plan to try to have a monopoly in the area around China and Japan; severely limiting our moves in that area.
20 posted on
08/19/2016 8:06:31 PM PDT by
CyberAnt
("Peace Through Strength")
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson