Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: DallasSun
I disagree. Telling people to commit a crime such as arson is not protected speech. In my opinion. It is like yelling fire in a theatre as they say.

Please see Brandenburg v. Ohio. The speech must intend to produce imminent lawless behavior. If someone is leading a group of thugs with torches down a suburban street and says, "Let's burn it down!" there might be imminent lawless behavior, but the fact that no one immediately acted upon her speech means the temporal condition has failed.

107 posted on 08/15/2016 2:08:03 PM PDT by SSS Two
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies ]


To: SSS Two

I understand your point. It is valid and well thought out..yet...I still believe they could arrest her..and should.But what do I know? It is just a reaction I think many would agree with. It does not mean I am right and you are wrong. It means you are thinking and I am pissed off. (My mama would not approve of my language...a lady does Not..(she would have said.)


109 posted on 08/15/2016 2:21:42 PM PDT by DallasSun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson