Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Spktyr
Bull’s range improvements came at a huge loss of accuracy. As in “oops, dropped a shell on our guys” loss of accuracy.

Bull was working on increasing velocity, and on a very low budget. He was about a year from putting a projectile into orbit when the US pulled his funding to avoid the embarrassment of someone actually agenting to orbit on a shoestring before our very expensive rocket program.

There was no attempt to maintain accuracy, and he was working with a very poorly constructed gun. Read the HARP* final report. The gun was made by welding two naval rifles together end-to-end and stiffening the assembly with guy wires. A purpose built tube could have done much, much better.

And his sabots were made of plywood. Constructed in a carpentry shop. Now I know that a "sabot" was originally a wooden shoe, but this was a quick & dirty expedient. A sabot made of modern aerospace materials would have a lot more uniformity and better accuracy.

If he had not been murdered, I think his guns would have produce astonishing results.

* This HARP is not the same as Obama's refinance program with the same acronym. It stood for High Altitude Research Project.

32 posted on 08/13/2016 12:39:36 AM PDT by CurlyDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]


To: CurlyDave
The HARP wasn't as cheesy as you'd have us believe: it was very well engineered and built. One excellent example is alive and well and sitting out in the desert waiting for a lance corporal and some WD-40 to get shooting again: The Martlet projectiles that Dr. Bull used were both free flight and rocket-assisted and were fully instrumented. Not exactly the flimsy effort you have described!
36 posted on 08/13/2016 6:02:41 AM PDT by Chainmail (A simple rule of life: if you can be blamed, you're responsible.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]

To: CurlyDave

Just read your response a second time. Didn’t you know that the HARP barrel was reamed to be a smoothbore? There was never any reason to make system “accurate”: it was designed to fire almost vertically to attain the highest possible altitude, not to hit some target on the ground.

The HARP sent a 400 pound projectile to an altitude of 110 miles - hardly a Mickey Mouse operation!

The project was cancelled more because of friction between Canada and our government over Vietnam than by the insidious machinations of the Missile Lobby.


38 posted on 08/13/2016 11:15:38 AM PDT by Chainmail (A simple rule of life: if you can be blamed, you're responsible.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]

To: CurlyDave

See my immediately prior post above, also take a look at Bull’s later career. His artillery pieces (the ones intended for combat) have not been as great as the legend surrounding Bull would have us believe.


42 posted on 08/13/2016 5:05:47 PM PDT by Spktyr (Overwhelmingly superior firepower and the willingness to use it is the only proven peace solution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson