[Alberta's Child]

The author's basic premise is completely flawed. Hillary Clinton doesn't have any "agenda" to speak of. Anything she says is missing details, and she has no game plan to follow through on anything.

There's a reason for this. For a candidate like Hillary Clinton, the only purpose of an "agenda" is to pretend she actually has a plan that will resonate with the voters whose support she needs. The reality is that this "agenda" is meaningless because she has no interest in them. Hillary Clinton is the Goldman Sachs candidate in this election, which means her "agenda" is whatever they want her to do ... and the Republicans in Congress won't stand in her way because most of them are supported by the same contributors who support Hillary Clinton.

The only "agenda" she will have is to use U.S. intelligence and military assets to support the big-government globalist agenda that has been the dominant theme inside the Beltway since 1990.

[laplata]

The only “agenda” she will have is to use U.S. intelligence and military assets to support the big-government globalist agenda that has been the dominant theme inside the Beltway since 1990.

---

BINGO!

It’s so obvious.

It really kicked in under Bush 41.