Posted on 08/10/2016 8:43:13 AM PDT by TigerClaws
None of Hillary Clinton's work-related emails discovered by the FBI after being deleted from her private server have been released, raising questions about whether any will be seen in public before Election Day.
The FBI says it found “several thousand” work-related emails Clinton deleted, but the State Department has not committed to a schedule for their release, and it will be up to a federal judge to determine when they could be made public.
“As we have just received this material from the FBI we are still assessing what our process will look like,” State spokeswoman Elizabeth Trudeau said in a statement to The Hill on Tuesday.
Multiple Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests and lawsuits have been filed to recover the emails. Litigants include conservative watchdog group Judicial Watch and Vice News journalist Jason Leopold.
The FBI recovered an unspecific number of the 30,000 deleted emails during the course of its yearlong investigation into Clinton’s email setup, which ultimately failed to produce an indictment against Clinton.
Clinton, now the Democratic nominee for president, handed over a similarly sized batch of 30,000 emails to the State Department for safekeeping in late 2014.
FBI Director James Comey said last month that among those recovered emails were “several thousand” work-related messages and three that contained classified information. Comey cautioned at the time that the FBI did not uncover evidence that Clinton intentionally tried to thwart transparency laws, instead suggesting it was extreme sloppiness on the part of the former secretary of State and her aides.
Last Friday, the FBI sent the final batch of emails it had recovered to the State Department, which is responsible for going through them to redact any information that is classified or otherwise exempt from public disclosure.
“Just as we appropriately processed the material turned over to the Department by former Secretary Clinton, we will appropriately and with due diligence process any additional material we receive from the FBI to identify work-related agency records and make them available to the public consistent with our legal obligations,” Trudeau said.
The ongoing delay complicates the odds that Clinton’s deleted emails are made public before the election in November.
“It's hard to say,” Steven Aftergood, who directs the Federation of American Scientists’ project on government secrecy, said in an email.
“I'm not sure where the line will ultimately be drawn.”
A delay until after the election could lead to allegations of a cover-up. GOP nominee Donald Trump has already warned that the election might be “rigged” against him, and he would likely use an email holdup as evidence.
“All things being equal, they should be released by the election,” predicted Tom Fitton, the president of Judicial Watch and a longtime Clinton antagonist. “But if the State Department once again plays campaign defense counsel for Mrs. Clinton, who knows?
“I just can’t imagine that untoward delays will be tolerated.”
A release in the weeks ahead of Nov. 8 might also be damaging for Clinton, however, by reigniting the public furor over a politically potent issue that the Democratic nominee’s presidential campaign has desperately been trying to put behind it.
Ultimately, most of the responsibility for deciding when the emails are released falls to a few federal judges in Washington, who are overseeing FOIA cases concerning Clinton’s emails. The judges are expected to order schedules for production in coming weeks.
“The decision is not entirely up to the State Department,” said Aftergood.
While judges have previously prodded the department not to dawdle with releases of Clinton’s emails, the State Department has routinely complained that FOIA lawsuits have overwhelmed its resources and has quoted review times that can seem comical. In June, the department claimed that it would need 75 years to process emails for top aides to Clinton in response to a lawsuit from the Republican National Committee.
The first opportunity for a judge to weigh in on the deleted emails is Aug. 22, when Judge James Boasberg is scheduled to oversee a hearing as part of a Judicial Watch case.
In a filing as part of a separate FOIA case, Obama administration lawyers this week indicated that all other decisions about processing the deleted Clinton emails should be delayed until after that hearing.
“[I]t would be in the best interests of judicial economy for a processing schedule to be entered in that case, given that any federal records in the retrieved materials are likely to be State Department records, and given that the State Department is a party to the Judicial Watch case,” government lawyers claimed.
That would leave just two and a half months to release the thousands of emails by Nov. 8.
Additionally, some of the cases concerning the deleted emails differ in minor ways, meaning that a ruling in the Judicial Watch suit might not apply to all emails being sought in other cases. Those discrepancies could further drag out the time necessary to review the emails and make them public.
The fix has been in from the beginning. There is no chance that those emails will be released if Hillary is elected.
They won’t EVER be seen unless some hacker has them.
Makes sense . . . you don’t want to let the American people have the wherewithal of full disclosure, otherwise they might not vote for her.
OTOH, if this were Donald Trump . . .
Might? LOL
This IS the Clintons we are dealing with.
Might??????????? It doesn’t matter. She will be queen. TPTB won’t have it any other way.
"Allegations"? No, it would BE a coverup, just another one in a long line of deliberate acts of corruption. About all we can do is take names at this point and await the day...
Of course they will. They have to give her majesty time to get in there and get rid of anything that could send her to prison.
Great. Hillary gets elected and this all goes down the memory hole.
Are all fed government employees dead-in-the-water-waiting-for-retirement or traitors? Isn’t there 1 who is willing to expose the corruption that appears endemic throughout? How pathetic. We have a criminal thug government replete with criminals.
Fine and Trump can release his tax returns then to.
Maybe the boys & girls will all get a nice bonus from the Clinton Foundation after they "clear" the Foundation of "wrongdoing" in October...
LOL!!!
Every foreign government in the world with a half decent intelligence apparatus has them, at the least.
Many would rather see Hillary get elected. Some would rather save the emails for blackmail. Still, I have to think that at least one country would like to throw a wrench in the gears of her campaign... Israel at the very least, and we can assume they have the emails since they are top tier in terms of cyber intel.
“work-related emails discovered by the FBI”
Each one of these is a crime in itself...and means that Hillary’s attorneys lied to the judge in the judicial watch case.
But I can tell you we do know, that April 18th, 2007 Sarah Palin texted Willow wanting to know if she wanted something from Chick Fil a!
>:(
The Same Standard just doesn't exist for the Media.
That was Proven 70 years ago with Walter Durante and the Ukrainian Famine, nothing has changed.
They believe it is not a scandal if they don't report it.
Some newspaper would have sued to have them released in the public interest and a judge would have ordered them released.
The Hill = low credibility. They publish fake photos of Clinton rallies.
One of the points discussed a Sky Harbor a few weeks back,no doubt.
We have a Criminal Government
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.