Posted on 08/10/2016 5:16:21 AM PDT by SJackson
Amid a great deal of obfuscation, the horrifying truth has emerged: a five-year-old girl in Twin Falls, Idaho, was gang-raped by three young Muslim migrant boys. Her parents are still encountering tremendous difficulties in trying to get justice -- apparently because the incident conflicts with Barack Obamas agenda to flood the country with Muslim migrants.
The victims mother told Pamela Geller what the little girl told her: This is what my daughter has told me: that they grabbed her at knifepoint and forced her into the laundry room and told her that if she tried to leave, they would kill her. The seven-year-old boy took her clothes off. She tells me he put his private in her mouth and peed in her mouth, and put it in her private, and then peed all over her.
According to Idaho law, that is rape: Rape is defined as the penetration, however slight, of the oral, anal or vaginal opening with a penis
The mother continued: And she said they recorded her, too She also told the emergency room CARES doctor that they had a knife as well, and they found on her neck a cut. Then the day after, they claimed it was a scratch, when in fact it looked like a cut.
The girls father told Geller what he saw on the video that one of the attackers took of the rape, and triumphantly showed him: I watched the 8-year-old boy push my daughter up against a wall and pull her pants down and his pants down; he then attempted to penetrate her from behind. She was able to run away and crouch in a corner shaking in fear while the boy danced around naked laughing at her. I stopped watching after that.
Amid all the controversy surrounding this terrible incident and the solicitude of Idaho officials for the attackers, not the victims (Wendy J. Olson, the Obama-appointed U.S. Attorney for Idaho, threatened: The spread of false information or inflammatory or threatening statements about the perpetrators or the crime itself reduces public safety and may violate federal law), one question has never been answered: why would these boys do this to this girl?
The answer lies where few analysts dare to look: in Islamic culture, and the Islamic theology that underlies it. The seizure of Infidel girls and their use as sex slaves is sanctioned in the Quran. According to Islamic law, Muslim men can take captives of the right hand (Quran 4:3, 4:24, 33:50). The Quran says: O Prophet! Lo! We have made lawful to you your wives to whom you have paid their dowries, and those whom your right hand possesses of those whom Allah has given you as spoils of war (33:50). 4:3 and 4:24 extend this privilege to Muslim men in general. The Quran says that a man may have sex with his wives and with these slave girls: The believers must win through, those who humble themselves in their prayers; who avoid vain talk; who are active in deeds of charity; who abstain from sex, except with those joined to them in the marriage bond, or whom their right hands possess, for they are free from blame. (Quran 23:1-6)
The rape of captive women is also sanctioned in Islamic tradition:
Abu Sirma said to Abu Said al Khadri (Allah he pleased with him): O Abu Said, did you hear Allahs Messenger (may peace be upon him) mentioning al-azl? He said: Yes, and added: We went out with Allahs Messenger (may peace be upon him) on the expedition to the Bil-Mustaliq and took captive some excellent Arab women; and we desired them, for we were suffering from the absence of our wives, (but at the same time) we also desired ransom for them. So we decided to have sexual intercourse with them but by observing azl (Withdrawing the male sexual organ before emission of semen to avoid conception). But we said: We are doing an act whereas Allahs Messenger is amongst us; why not ask him? So we asked Allahs Messenger (may peace be upon him), and he said: It does not matter if you do not do it, for every soul that is to be born up to the Day of Resurrection will be born. (Sahih Muslim 3371)
It is also in Islamic law: When a child or a woman is taken captive, they become slaves by the fact of capture, and the womans previous marriage is immediately annulled. (Umdat al-Salik O9.13)
The Egyptian Sheikh Abu-Ishaq al-Huwayni declared in May 2011 that we are in the era of jihad, and that meant Muslims would take slaves. In a subsequent interview he elaborated:
Jihad is only between Muslims and infidels. Spoils, slaves, and prisoners are only to be taken in war between Muslims and infidels. Muslims in the past conquered, invaded, and took over countries. This is agreed to by all scholarsthere is no disagreement on this from any of them, from the smallest to the largest, on the issue of taking spoils and prisoners. The prisoners and spoils are distributed among the fighters, which includes men, women, children, wealth, and so on.
When a slave market is erected, which is a market in which are sold slaves and sex-slaves, which are called in the Quran by the name milk al-yamin, that which your right hands possess [Koran 4:24]. This is a verse from the Quran which is still in force, and has not been abrogated. The milk al-yamin are the sex-slaves. You go to the market, look at the sex-slave, and buy her. She becomes like your wife, (but) she doesnt need a (marriage) contract or a divorce like a free woman, nor does she need a wali. All scholars agree on this pointthere is no disagreement from any of them. [ ] When I want a sex slave, I just go to the market and choose the woman I like and purchase her.
Around the same time, on May 25, 2011, a female Kuwaiti politician, Salwa al-Mutairi, also spoke out in favor of the Islamic practice of sexual slavery of non-Muslim women, emphasizing that the practice accorded with Islamic law and the parameters of Islamic morality:
A merchant told me that he would like to have a sex slave. He said he would not be negligent with her, and that Islam permitted this sort of thing. He was speaking the truth. I brought up [this mans] situation to the muftis in Mecca. I told them that I had a question, since they were men who specialized in what was halal, and what was good, and who loved women. I said, What is the law of sex slaves?
The mufti said, With the law of sex slaves, there must be a Muslim nation at war with a Christian nation, or a nation which is not of the religion, not of the religion of Islam. And there must be prisoners of war.
Is this forbidden by Islam? I asked.
Absolutely not. Sex slaves are not forbidden by Islam. On the contrary, sex slaves are under a different law than the free woman. The free woman must be completely covered except for her face and hands. But the sex slave can be naked from the waist up. She differs a lot from the free woman. While the free woman requires a marriage contract, the sex slave does notshe only needs to be purchased by her husband, and thats it. Therefore the sex slave is different than the free woman.
Iraqi Ayatollah Al-Haeri said in April 7, 2016 that a man could offer slave girls to a friend for sex.
The savage exploitation of girls and young women is, unfortunately, a cross-cultural phenomenon, but only in Islamic law does it carry divine sanction. And now it has come to Idaho.
Because.... Yogurt
bfl
Where are the f***ing cops and courts!!? Did they all become Muslim!?
They are NOT ‘refugees’.
They are NOT ‘migrants’.
They are NOT ‘immigrants’.
They are NOT ‘asylum seekers’
.
They are NOT ‘citizens’; nor will they ever be citizens of any country, except of the subhuman, murderous, political filth & ideological sewage called islam.
And islam is NOT a ‘religion’. It is a total political-social system, intended and designed for conquest, destruction and death of anything which opposes it.
The enemy is the subhuman filth, called islam. It is incompatible with Western Civilization.
THEY ARE FERAL, 7th CENTURY, TRIBAL *moslem* INVADERS.
They are carrying diseases we eradicated decades ago, and re-spreading them throughout the Western World’s Civilizations.
The islamists will not assimilate, and are coming to take over our countries, our way of life, and kill us all.
The flood of islamic rapists, mutilators, molesters and murderers is just beginning.
It will get many times worse this year, even after 0sambo and Merkel are gone from office, and are in hell where they belong.
The murderous islamic caliphate, and its subhuman, lowlife tribal moslem filth, are on the move, worldwide
.
The murderous filth of islam - moslems - are our problem, not ‘gun control’ or ‘climate change’.
Wake-up America and Europe!
Don't be a Yogurtist.
Not all yogurt is bad (well, OK, technically, it is spoiled milk, still...).
It's Turkish moslem owned Chobani that imports thousands of "refugees" who wipe with their left and won't use alcohol based hand cleaners to make their brand of yogurt.
Gives it a special 'earthy' flavor...
I would have thought there’d be some ol’ boys in Idaho who would take affront to such actions and the offending family might not show up one day. The neighbors wouldn’t be surprised to see the offender’s house burned to the ground, either. I guess not. I’m dissapointed, Idaho. Perhaps we will let them come do as they damn well please like the French, Germans and Swedes have done. There was a time, not so long ago, where these “people” would be dealt with in a harsh, but deserved manner, and any in authority who tried to protect them would share their fate. We (the West) like to feel we have evolved past Frontier justice, but we have in our midst an enemy who understands nothing else.
So sad. Our Country is falling fast. It is ALMOST too late.... perhaps it is too late. I hardly recognize it anymore with the corruption everywhere. No justice.
Of course people will continue to not do anything in the U.S., all while they mock the Europeans for not doing anything. Nothing happened when the TSA substandard losers started irradiating, molesting, and humiliating the flying public. Nothing happened when the guns were confiscated in Boston. Nothing’s happened to rein in the completely out-of-control USSA Communist government.
Yeah, I sure miss Grandpa’s America.
I think it’s gonna come to fighting. It’s too late to correct now, with so very many vermin among us, of several species, undocumented, and given cover by our progressives and Enemedia.
“danced around naked laughing at her”
There are only two groups in the world that do this. Street savages and muzzard savages. Both are specially-privileged government-certified victim groups that can do no wrong, and are allowed to get away with their crimes.
Twin Falls... Morman dominated, explains their timid, meek tolerance and refusal to handle this situation in the proper way.
If such a crime happened in the northern Panhandle of Idaho, it would have been handled much differently... swift justice.
Yeah, I suppose there will be fighting, since war has already been declared. These animals justify raping and enslaving girls by claiming they are spoils of war, so obviously there must be a war, right?
A weird war, where borders mean nothing (Islam is not a country).
A war where anyone can be a soldier and none wear uniforms. Your neighbor could claim to be a victim, a refugee, an immigrant, then turn and do horrible violence to you and your family.
A war without frontlines, that can break out anywhere, including Twin Falls, Idaho.
A war that if you fight back, you'll be arrested by your own gov't, who allowed and encouraged the enemy to invade and attack us.
If it was my daughter, the boy’s life would not be secure if I ever encountered him.
“When a government no longer protects or defends its citizens against violent criminals, or worse, takes the side of the criminals against their citizens, vigilantism results.”
“The vast majority of the life cycle of a vigilance movement is peaceful, orderly, and legal. Three things must happen for a vigilance movement to become violent:
1) All peaceful means of change are thwarted. Elections are corrupted. Petitions are ignored. Individual means of self defense (guns) are prohibited. Police and courts ignore crime and protect the criminals.
2) The government decides that the vigilantes are a threat to its continued power, and tries to crack down on meetings, block watches, and to isolate and even arrest its leaders.
3) The government encourages and enables the criminals to attack the vigilantes and their families, including murder. Until now, the vigilantes still just want to drive the criminals out; but at any point they may become a mob. Any armed resistance against them will result in violence.
By this point, the local government is either exiled or killed along with the criminals. Some times passes, and the higher government arrives, by which time things are returning to normality and stability. Having accomplished its purpose, the vigilance organization quickly dissolves, leaving little evidence behind.
Gotta go back a ways to get to the first link he cites, about being in the era of jihad. Here’s a link that works (for now): https://web.archive.org/web/20110608163423/http://www.translatingjihad.com/2011/05/egyptian-shaykh-jihad-is-solution-to.html
Your post explains it all.
Boycott Chobani - they support the rape of white children by Islamic savages.
Apparently the TF “City Fathers” are bought off Dhimmis.
I am moving to Idaho to retire. I can’t stand being surrounded by libs anymore. Sad to see Idaho has gone soft.
The Mormons I grew up with in Idaho in the 1970s and 1980s would never have tolerated this crap, and those perps would have been looking for a new place to live. In the 1990s, the leadership started going full-on libtard, and it's been downhill ever since. Most of my Mormon friends from those days are outright conservatives, both fiscally, and socially. They're not swayed by the likes of Romney and others.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.