Posted on 08/09/2016 1:29:05 PM PDT by Signalman
Edited on 08/09/2016 1:34:16 PM PDT by Admin Moderator. [history]
Donald Trump is suggesting that if Hillary Clinton gets to pick federal judges as president, there is nothing that can be done to protect the right to bear arms.
But then he adds without elaboration that maybe supporters of the Second Amendment could figure out a way.
(Excerpt) Read more at nypost.com ...
The MSM is suddenly pumping this story big time... it's this week's coordinated attack.
But Trump has to learn this is what they are going to do. They are going
to hit him over the head with little jokes like these. The media is biased
and wants hillary to win. This stupid thing is gonna eat up the next week
and AGAIN, hillary gets away with inviting the orlando shooters dad to her
speech. That is now a dead subject because of this trump 2nd amendment comment.
Oh this is the story for the next 48 hours people. Just checked ABC, CBS, CNN..... lead story on each.
I hope the second amendment people do something about the editorial decision makers for those networks.
Ugh I’m so sick of this non stop bullshit from them!!!
Sure you can.
"The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people."
Ain't nothing in the Constitution that prohibits the people from removing a traitor from office with extreme prejudice if the other remedies fail, so that power belongs to the people!
The second amendment only recognizes our natural right to defend ourselves
it is a God-given right (and duty, for that matter)
it is not granted to us by the Constitution, the Constitution only sought to prevent government from infringing, restricting, licensing, taxing, regulating, or otherwise denying our right to keep and bear arms
the Constitution has obviously failed. Governmental dictatorship is out of control again, just as it was in King George’s day. (The results will likely be similar, too.......)
B/S. Trump was alluding to the intent of the second amendment. She can try to annul the second amendment all she wants, but she’s NOT going to take our guns, ie, “You want my gun, come and TAKE it!”
If Hillary or Trump gets assassinated it’ll be by a Democrat.
Lieing peice of crap.
“By the way, if she gets to pick her judges, nothing you can do, folks. Although the Second Amendment people, maybe there is, I don’t know.”
This statement is going to require a leap of logic to equate this to an assassination threat. Let them run with it. Their true believers will eat it up and look like morons while the independents are going to scratch their heads over this nonsense.
Trump shouldn’t even reply to this article. It’s that frigging ridiculous.
LOL!
I agree.
But only in the alternate universe in which the Orlando shooters taliban supporting, gay hating dad supporting the democrat counts as news.
No, I disagree. Trump needs to stay the course.
What this shows is the following:
Trump - Good morning.
Press - Morning! That is code for whites! He’s racist!
IOW, they’ll flat out make up anything they want.
To get this reaction, it means Trump is causing damage to PIAPS.
So? That's not unusual. Their job is to make the most extreme accusation with the flimsiest of basis. Then their opponent is stuck either ignoring the accusation, or defending himself.
More LibMedia templated fiction projection. The boiler rooms are running nonstop.
Trump campaign already responded. He had to.
I haven’t seen the hillary campaign respond to something trump said so quick.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.