Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: IronJack

I disagree with that when you know they’re guilty and slandering a child like that.


55 posted on 08/09/2016 11:26:43 AM PDT by VermithraxPejorative (HILLARY NEEDS TO ANSWER FOR DEMOCRAT JUDGES SOFT ON CRIME/REPEAT OFFENDERS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]


To: VermithraxPejorative

Guilt and innocence aren’t particularly relevant in a criminal case. More important is due process. The prosecution builds its case; the defense answers. The theory is that if both parties do their jobs to their utmost, the final result will be just.

Even if a defense attorney knows his client is guilty as sin, his job is still to force the prosecution to build his best case. Look at OJ Simpson. The defense wasn’t all that good, but the prosecution was that bad. Was he guilty? Of course he was. Did the state prove it beyond a shadow of a doubt? Obviously not.

Hillary did her part as a defense counsel. But it was NOT her part to laugh and joke about it afterward. Anyone with a conscience would have gone home proud of serving due process, then cried themselves to sleep.


63 posted on 08/09/2016 12:13:58 PM PDT by IronJack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson