I guess if you were to boil it all up one take would be he was responsible for killing a lot of terror types which probably pissed off his ol' man who is a slime dog of the first degree so he knowingly did a suicide thing,hard to imagine but strange things happen.
Here's some more on his ol' man this time from Wayne Madson another brilliant researcher:
http://waynemadsenreport.com/articles/20160731
Pakistan was not a member of the U.S. coalition in Iraq, which begs the question of why the Pakistani embassy's ISI chief attended Captain Humayun Khan's funeral at Arlington? Was Khan working, through his Saudi- and Pakistani-connected father with the ISI? If so, was the contact "sanctioned" by the CIA? If not, was Humayun Khan freelancing and feeding information from Iraq to the ISI, which then passed it to their close allies in the Saudi General Intelligence Department?
Khizr Khan claims he is a "legal consultant" in Charlottesville, although he is not a member of the Virginia Bar.
Given the nature of Charlotteville's status as a sanctuary city, Khan's legal background and his work with the Muslim community in Virginia, it is likely that Khan offers help to Muslims who have overstayed their student visas in the university and sanctuary city to obtain permanent residence.
It should be recalled that seven of the 9/11 hijackers obtained Virginia driver's licenses, three of which were used as official identification to check in for flights on September 11, 2001. Perhaps if Khizr Khan had not been so willing to help dodgy Muslim "students" overstay their visas and seek workarounds to the law, Virginia might have been able to prevent the hijackers fraudulently obtain driver's licenses. And had there been no 9/11, there certainly would have been no U.S. invasion of Iraq and Humayun Khan would have realized his dream of attending the University of Virginia law school and becoming a military lawyer.
In making it easy for Saudis, Emiratis, and others to game the U.S. immigration system, Khizr Khan shares in some of the responsibility for his son's death.
This, of course, is too complicated for the two dimensional-thinking Trump. Because it is not advisable to attack any Gold Star family, Trump should have merely replied to Khizr Khan's attack by saying, "I understand the family's loss and although they attacked me, I will not respond to a grieving family." Trump could have added that Captain Khan would not have died had it not been for the U.S. invasion and occupation of Iraq, a war for which Hillary Clinton voted as a senator. Through surrogates, Trump could have revealed the Khans' connections to the Muslim Brotherhood, Sharia law advocates, the Saudis, and the ISI.
“Because it is not advisable to attack any Gold Star family”
Trump absolutely DID NOT attack the Khan family. He was asked a question and attempted to defend himself from an umprovoked character assassination by Khan, who has turned out to be just a Clinton paid crony. Saying the wife maybe didn’t speak because maybe she’s not allowed to speak is a factual statement. Devout Muslims, and that is exactly what this family is, the wife keeps her mouth shut until the husband gives her permission to speak. This nonsense about Trump attacking this family is 100% BS of the first degree and it’s only out there because the sorry ass media keeps repeating the lie over and over and over. And they were helped by worthless republican politicians agreeing with them. Lou Dobbs, who has more sense than all of them combined, said Trump in no way shape or form attacked this family. I agree 100% with Dobbs and anyone that listens to Trump’s words knows damn well it was not an attack on the Khans. The one that did the attacking on a man he does not know is the Clinton surrogate Khan. Letting the media set the narrative, and frame the narrative is despicable and that’s exactly what has happened with this story.
Still could.