John McCain: The Muslim Brotherhood’s Senator

Senator John McCain’s most recent rant against Donald Trump, taking the side of Muslim Brotherhood connected Democrat Khizr Khan and personally defending him against Trump’s criticism of his speech to the McCain MorsiDemocratic National Convention prompts us to ask “Why does John McCain always take the side of the Muslim Brotherhood?”

Khizr Khan’s ties to the Muslim Brotherhood have been documented by Walid and Robert Shoebat in a lengthy expose you can read through this link.

Among the Shoebats’ more revealing findings is their review of Khizr Khan’s magnum opus on Shariah or Islamic law entitled “Juristic Classification of Islamic Law” in which he made this revealing statement:

This brings up an important fact which is generally overlooked, that the invariable and basic rules of Islamic Law are only those prescribed in the Shari'ah (Quran and Sunnah) which are few and limited. All other juridical works which have been written during the more than thirteen centuries are very rich and indispensable, but they must always be subordinate to the Shari'ah and open to reconsideration by all Muslims.

In other words, all other law, such as the United States Constitution and Bill of Rights are subordinate to the Shariah and if we understand the concept of “open to reconsideration by all Muslims” correctly, are invalid if they conflict with Shariah.

This would be, by the way, the same Constitution which Khan’s son, U.S. Army Captain Humayun Khan, swore to “support and defend” against all enemies, foreign and domestic, and to “bear true faith and allegiance to” before he was killed in Iraq in 2004.

Surely Senator McCain could have and should have known of Walid and Robert Shoebat’s revelations about Khizir Khan before he criticized Donald Trump and accused him of “defaming” a hero’s parents.

Saner heads might think it had something to do with the military angle (like so much else in McCain's career). Or with what Trump had to say about him a few months back.

Because he spends all his time trolling obscure websites? McCain (like Trump) is an impulsive, shoot first guy. I doubt either is following websites as closely as we Internet junkies are.

Disagree.

Both Trump and McCain are VERY calculated. McCain is a shill for Hillary and the globalists who have funded him for all his political career. He is owned and controlled and HAS to say what he says by order (like the MSM).. It is for the repetition of the communist narrative always-—to promote “proper” perceptions in the stupid, ignorant unwashed masses.

Trump has common sense and survival skills and says what is true....like why he attacked the evil Muslim Brotherhood Hillary subversive plant, Khan, who is literally bringing in thousands of muslim cells for the takeover of America and promoting Sharia. Trump has insider information and is privy to the stolen emails. He is playing the evil, controlled Pravda press. Actually, watching Trump is a riot since the Left don’t know how to shut him up—they are so dumb-founded.

FLASHBACK:

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-middle-east-23849587

Syria crisis: Where key countries stand

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/middle-east/syria-the-saudi-connection-the-prince-with-close-ties-to-washington-at-the-heart-of-the-push-for-war-8785049.html

It was Prince Bandar’s intelligence agency that first alerted Western allies to the alleged use of sarin gas by the Syrian regime in February.

While a trip earlier this month to the Kremlin to try to cajole President Vladimir Putin into withdrawing his support for President Assad reportedly failed, Prince Bandar automatically has greater leverage in Western capitals, not least because of friendships forged during his time in Washington. His most recent travels, rarely advertised, have taken him to both London and Paris for discussions with senior officials.

As ambassador, Prince Bandar left an imprint that still has not quite faded. His voice was one of the loudest urging the United States to invade Iraq in 2003. In the 1980s, Prince Bandar became mired in the Iran-Contra scandal in Nicaragua.

Months of applying pressure on the White House and Congress over Syria have slowly born fruit. The CIA is believed to have been working with Prince Bandar directly since last year in training rebels at base in Jordan close to the Syrian border.

The Saudis are “indispensable partners on Syria” and have considerable influence on American thinking, a senior US official told The Wall Street Journal yesterday. He added: “No one wants to do anything alone”.

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424127887323423804579024452583045962.html

The Saudi ambassador, Mr. Jubeir, has long been courting members of Congress who could pressure the administration to get more involved in Syria. He found early support from Republican Sens. John McCain of Arizona and Lindsey Graham of South Carolina.

(snip)

Mr. Petraeus in mid-2012 won White House approval to provide intelligence and limited training to Syrian rebels at the base, including in the use of arms provided by others. Saudi and Jordanian agents began vetting the fighters to be trained, said Arab diplomats and a former U.S. military official.

Prince Bandar has largely stayed out of Washington but held meetings with U.S. officials in the region. One was in September 2012. Sens. McCain and Graham, who were in Istanbul, met him in an opulent hotel suite on the banks of the Bosporus.

Mr. McCain said he made the case to Prince Bandar that the rebels weren’t getting the kinds of weapons they needed, and the prince, in turn, described the kingdom’s plans. The senator said that in succeeding months he saw “a dramatic increase in Saudi involvement, hands-on, by Bandar.”

(snip)

That winter, the Saudis also started trying to convince Western governments that Mr. Assad had crossed what President Barack Obama a year ago called a “red line”: the use of chemical weapons. Arab diplomats say Saudi agents flew an injured Syrian to Britain, where tests showed sarin gas exposure. Prince Bandar’s spy service, which concluded in February that Mr. Assad was using chemical weapons, relayed evidence to the U.S., which reached a similar conclusion four months later. The Assad regime denies using such weapons.

After Mr. Petraeus’s November resignation over an affair, his job was handled by his deputy, Michael Morell, who privately voiced skepticism the agency could make sure any arms supplied by the U.S. wouldn’t end up with hard-line Islamists, said congressional officials.

Ultimately, the new CIA chief was John Brennan, whose closest Saudi confidant when he was White House counterterrorism adviser was also focused on the risk of inadvertently strengthening al Qaeda. Since moving to the CIA, Mr. Brennan has been in periodic contact by phone with Prince Bandar, officials said.

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.